Latest software headlines from Network World:
At 10, Google reiterates commitment to CIOs
As Google turns 10, enterprise success in question
Zoho adds Google Docs-like file management
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
Whose fault is it
Clearly there is a reason why the banks act as irresponsibly as they do. As you said, they make money when people use their credit cards. Any attempt to improve security, like looking at ID, reminds the customer that there is a security risk - which might lead to them using the card less. Even though that liability limit of $50 is there, most Americans ARE worried about fraud - so nobody is going to do anything to remind them of that risk. The answer IS to educate the consumer, but the banks have a good reason NOT to do it.... maybe they should be teaching kids this stuff in high school.