|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
Ah, yes. Another insightful
Ah, yes. Another insightful business commentary from Mr. Mathias.
Your comments about Motorola are either woefully misguided or incredibly biased. Obviously you won't disclose what type of consulting fee (if any) you are drawing from Moto, so I guess we'll never know which it is.
Moto has botched their position as a cellular handset vendor and their acquisition of Symbol so royally that it is almost redundant to even mention it. More importantly, you seem to be embracing their failed strategy. Moto seems to be trying to bundle all sorts of wireless technologies together when they often don't fit. That's why their RF switch has been an embarrassing failure.
They seem to lack vision for the WLAN infrastructure they acquired from Symbol and this new idea looks like a loser. Aruba has security, Meru has voice, Trapeze has management, Cisco has Cisco and Moto has... indoor mesh?
Please, Mr. Mathias, at least show a modicum of journalistic integrity and acknowledge that Moto's problems have nothing to do with investors like Carl Icahn.