|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
RE: Cisco hater
Get over it, this was a performance test. I didn't see anything to indicate cost. Bottom line is that you get what you pay for. Based on past experience with many of these product lines I could never recommend Dell, HP, Alcatel and many of the others due to hardware stability issues. If you want to buy the cheapest switch (with horrible support) then go right ahead, it's your money. If you take a look at the number of features supported Cisco wins everytime, but that isn't to say that you need half of those features. Extreme and Foundry make very nice switches, but they don't always have everything you need 100% of the time.
Basically you need to get over the fact that Cisco makes a decent product despite the high prices that they charge. BTW your analogy is completely horrible!