Your arguments make as much sense as the idea that in somehow creating Anti-Gun Laws, you will find yourself safer. The real clue here is...there will always be law breakers, and if they are going to break the law already, say for murder, they are not going to stop and ask themselves...should I also break the law of "insert your own firearm law here?" Laws keep the law abiding in line; nothing more. The same holds true for our enemies, whether they be terrorists or other countries. When it becomes a life or death struggle, the Marquess of Queensberry rules will always be tossed by the wayside. Perhaps you would feel better about yourself when the infrastructure about you is down around your ankles, knowing that you could have done more to prevent it (very similar to the policy of assured mutual destruction...ya know, the concept that help win the Cold War), but you didnt because you were somehow more civilized. And now those around you are potentially dead. We KNOW for a fact that other countries such as CHINA have had dedicated units in their military, devoted to cyberwarfare...we are playing catchup already. We also know for a fact that they are not only targeting command and control...but power, wastewater treatment, energy production.....the list goes on. If you ask my opinion, we should have gotten the clue earlier...just as we should have understood, we were at war with the terrorists since the 70's because they WERE at war with us.