Latest software headlines from Network World:
At 10, Google reiterates commitment to CIOs
As Google turns 10, enterprise success in question
Zoho adds Google Docs-like file management
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
Does the liklihood of email infection increase with certain type
I've been a Notes/Domino person for as long as I can remember and in all that time, I've never seen a virus acting within the mail client.
Funnily enough, although I almost never use outlook, I've seen virus activity in the mail client far more times that I can count.
Is outlook less secure than Notes? Probably. Is it less common and therefore has less viruses associated with it. Again, Probably.
Personally though, I think it comes down to differences in the degree and type of automation that the developers (Microsoft and IBM) permit in terms of external automation.
Since most of the time, the additional "hooks" in outlook are a liability, not a benefit, surely Microsoft could offer ways to turn them off?