Latest software headlines from Network World:
At 10, Google reiterates commitment to CIOs
As Google turns 10, enterprise success in question
Zoho adds Google Docs-like file management
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
Latest excuse to grab more of our privacy
We have given up huge portions (maybe all) of our privacy to the federal government. Not even sure why.
In the 80's the excuse was "narco-terrorists"
In the 90's the excuse was "pedophiles"
In the 00's the excuse is "global war on terrorism"
The constitution has well-tested provisions for personal privacy, but the current conservatives have eliminated many of these critical laws. I can't figure it out - conservatives has historically been wary of the unchecked power of central government. Now they have given us the "Unitary Presidency", which means an all-powerful monarch in my book.
I don't have an answer on this, but I suspect many, many people would join me in fearing unlimited power by the feds.
Oh, BTW, a subtext in your article was "Vosburgh WAS a history professor". Sounds like he was forced to resign prior to proving guilt. Cool! Gutless private companies (universities) doing what the the law should (or does) prohibit.
Sounds similar to the push for Telecom wire tap immunity. We will probably never know what data was gathered and on who, and what it was used for.
I could go on in depth.
Keep up the good work, dude!