|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
Should Microsoft be held accountable for lack of MS' OS choices
I think the majority of people who prefer XP over Vista is because of the difference in the software approach of the Window's explorer file listing system, UAC controls and it's incompatability with older software.
Including myself, I am confused on the Vista search methods & software installations. It seems to take a few more steps in Vista to install software or find a file in a specific directory. There are times when I know a file exists on my hard drive, but Vista returns a "No files found" message.
This is what frustrates most people with Vista.
It's like a person has been riding a bicycle for years, and suddenly Microsoft hand's you a Unicycle. And they tell you it's the same thing but the only difference is that it's missing a wheel. They never tell you you have to learn how to ride all over again. Plus most workplaces will not let you take the time to get familar with the new OS, they expect you to know it inside/out at first touch.