|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
Certificates fulfil more than one function
One function of certificates is to authenticate sites. The other, equally important function, is to encrypt the connection. For an application that needs the encryption but doesn't need the authentication (webmail within a corporate intranet is a perfect example) Firefox's policy is obviously flawed.
At the very least, the pop-up message needs to be rewritten, as it does not fully explain in non-technical language why it has blocked the page, what you can do to view the page anyway, and under what circumstances it's perfectly ok to view the page despite the warning. If Mozilla tech's goal is to "fully inform their 'customers'" they are doing a terrible job of it.