|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
Great Idea, But Who Validates The Process?
As a holder of several top certifications, I have worked hard for each exam and despise cheating. But who validates the forensics (since this will destroy somones career for life)? In any investigation, there are always false positives. Legitimate people (even if only a few) will be caught unfairly. How will this be policed? If we let the companies make the decision whether their process is incorrectly destroying some people, will they publicly admit it without spending a life savings to go after them? I strongly doubt it. If I were wrongly convicted in China, would the government admit it and let the public know there was a failure in their system. same situation. In Public trials in the U.S. there are failures. There are subsequent appeal processes, lawsuits, etc. Is there a simple appeal process here and the willingness of the companies to pay reparations? Again, I like the idea, but left unchecked without overwhelming proof would be irresponible.