|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info
[589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos]
[407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"?
[1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games
[682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow]
[578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX
[1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow]
[409]
|
|
War on cyper crime?
Assassinations might work to some extent but not really solve the problems. Criminals are opportunists (as any entrepreneur, just different moral view - I hope!) - give them an opportunity and they take it.
Now - who and why thought that executing any code coming from uncontrolled source is a good idea? I have no sympathy (well, almost none) to sites falling in SQL injection attacks or any other which execute any code coming from an uncontrolled source. There would be no need for that except successful marketing, lazy and incompetent site design, and so on. Of course you can't wait uneducated public understanding but how the IT did go to that trap? There is not much we can do if the user allows some malicious code to be installed and then runs it but automating the functionality for bad guys?