Gorman's statement of "Our commitment to Linux has not changed," is a Bald-Faced Lie (BBFL). How can you make it *harder* to obtain a Linux based PC by taking away an option, and then say your "commitment" has not changed?? Maybe I am missing or overlooking something, but it makes no sense to me, and furthermore, makes Gorman look foolish for having made this "claim". A company gains more stature in my book if they are more honest and just state that product offering "X" did not meet their business requirements, versus trying to put a positive spin on things.

I agree, also, with the previous poster about unrealistic expectations when there is no marketing of an offering. Or did I miss the TV commercial?