Network World
Monday, October 13, 2008
DNSstuff.com
Get information about your IP
IP Information
50+ On-demand DNS and network tools

Layer8

Layer 8

Navigation

Internet domain name outlaw faces 20 years in federal prison

A Las Vegas man faces about 20 years in prison today after he agreed to plead guilty to wire fraud for impersonating an intellectual property lawyer and threatening lawsuits against the owners of Internet domain names.

According to the FBI, David Scali is charged with registering an e-mail account under an alias and then sending e-mails in which he claimed to be the intellectual property lawyer. In the e-mails, which were sent in late June and early July of 2006, Scali threatened to file $100,000 trademark infringement lawsuits against the owners of various Internet website names unless they gave up their domain name registrations within two days.

Published reports said Scali specialized in going after one-off or domain names with nomenclature similar to big name Web sites.

Cybersquatters who routinely snap up these typo-based domain sites looking to make a quick buck off of other people's hard work is one of the unsavory practices on the Internet.

Ron Jackson, editor and publisher of the online magazine Domain Name Journal, said in a recent interview that with a well-known trademark like a Microsoft, where so many people are trying to get on a given day, a good typo - meaning one that a lot of people would make the error of typing in - could generate thousands of dollars a month. There could be one on a lesser-known brand that has less traffic that maybe makes $10 a month, but some of these guys might hold tens of thousands of domains. If it costs them $10 a year to register a domain, and if they make $5 or $10 a month multiplied across thousands of domains, it becomes a significant amount of money, he said.

Microsoft earlier this year filed two new lawsuits against companies it accuses of registering domain names similar to certain of its trademarks. It alleged that the companies intentionally registered domain names with variations of its trademarks, a practice known as cybersquatting, or misspellings of those names, known as typosquatting. Often, domains registered in this way point to Web pages containing advertisements that, if clicked upon, generate revenue for the owner of the domain. Microsoft said the practice is deceptive and confusing for users. Microsoft will receive damages from some companies, it said.

In Scali's case the wire fraud count in the criminal information filed this morning concerns a victim who surrendered an Internet domain name very similar to citysearch.com

The wire fraud charge carries a maximum statutory sentence of 20 years in federal prison. The plea agreement contemplates a sentence ranging from probation to six months in custody, ultimately the sentencing judge will make the final decision as to what Scali's sentence will be, the FBI says.

What he did wrong

Useful answer?
0

As near as I can reckon the only thing he did wrong was to use a false name and pretend to be a lawyer.

If he had been a lawyer using his real name I guess it would have been OK

A touch simplistic

Useful answer?
0

I'm sure the law enforcement types involved here have a bit better understanding than that abut what's wrong here, but there's a big difference between what's wrong but unprovable, and what's illegal but provable. After all, they busted Al Capone for tax evasion because that's what they could prove.

They nailed this guy for blackmailing people out of their domains under false pretenses, or trying to. True. But if he had been a lawyer, they could have gotten him for something else, considering that he had no claim to the domains in the first place. And if he had a claim, and if the squatters caved, then he could have been nailed by the owners of the legit domains.

Simple Truth

Useful answer?
0

"They nailed this guy for blackmailing people out of their domains under false pretenses, or trying to. True. But if he had been a lawyer, they could have gotten him for something else[...]"

Not so, unfortunately. The only reason anybody in "law enforcement" cared was because this Scali guy pretended to be a lawyer and real lawyers would have made life difficult for the cops until they dealt with it.

Had he actually been a real lawyer, this complaint would not even have got any further than the trashcan of the cop at the front desk. That is, if the person complaining also wasn't a lawyer.

Lawyers think lawyers making money in any way they can, be it legal, ethical, moral or otherwise, is a really neat thing.

I can make life difficult for police?

Useful answer?
0

"and real lawyers would have made life difficult for the cops until they dealt with it."

OK, I'm a lawyer, but apparently I missed this class in law school. How exactly do I go about "making life difficult for the cops" over some petty unauthorized practice of law dispute? Or any dispute, for that matter?

I can make life difficult for police?- Yes

Useful answer?
0

When a reputable lawyer with evidence of a crime reports it to the police, he's also an officer of the court. If he has reason to believe that his report is being ignored, depending on the nature of the crime, he can report it to the district attorney, the FBI, the FTC etc, and not be ignored. If he doesn't mind repercussions like close scrutiny of his business and personal life, he can go to the media.

The media LOVE to hear about possible crimes, especially if they are being ignored by the police. It doesn't actually matter if XXXX happened, they can phrase an accusation as a question, and get away with it because "We're just looking for the truth". They have the ability to ask appointed officials embarrassing questions like "Isn't it true that - xxxx?" and asking their opponents " What do you think about the charge that -xxxxx?

Elected police officials are well known for infighting and passing the buck to avoid being associated with any publicly-known misconduct. They upt the pressure on the police to investigate the charges, even if everyone knows the charges 0are unfounded. the police then have to conduct a much more rigorous investigation to avoid looking like they aren't doing their jobs.

Not so fast

Useful answer?
0

"False pretenses is the crime of "obtaining title to the property of another by an intentional (or knowingly) false statement of past or existing facts with intent to defraud the rightful owner."

"The difference between false pretenses and larceny is what is obtained by the deceit. If possession of the property is obtained, the crime is larceny; if title to the property is obtained, then the crime is false pretenses."

So in actuality, he likely was guilty of several other crimes as well as the False Pretenses charge, i.e., he misrepresented himself as a lawyer, he used a computer in the commission of a crime, his email likely crossed state boundaries, forced or coerced an action by threat which might be a terroist act under the Patriot Act, and he attempted to obtain title for the purpose of committing other criminal acts against other legitimate businesses.

I say, let him teach computer classes in prison.

RE

Useful answer?
0

While we're on the subject of deceit, did anyone notice that the title of this article is "Internet domain name outlaw faces 20 years in federal prison", while the closing paragraph states "The plea agreement contemplates a sentence ranging from probation to six months in custody"?

Nice job promoting sensationalistic journalist trash NetworkWorld. We know that if the title had be "Internet domain name outlaw may face probation" wouldn't have generated as many ad clicks for NetworkWorld, so clearly the practice of deceiving people to gain ad revenue is much more widely accepted here than we're made to believe.

Not deceit but certainly

Useful answer?
0

Not deceit but certainly could be clearer.  Here's EXACTLY what the FBI is saying: The wire fraud charge carries a maximum statutory sentence of 20 years in federal prison. The plea agreement contemplates a sentence ranging from probation to six months in custody, ultimately the sentencing judge will make the final decision as to what Scali's sentence will receive, the FBI says.

How much time he'll get is up to the judge.

Actually is very rare that a

Useful answer?
0

Actually is very rare that a Judge will "throw out" a plea agreement sentence submitted by the prosecutor (if they actually have submitted aforesaid), from reading this I might understand they have not made an agreement on a plea but is in the works.

"I say, let him teach computer classes in prison."

Useful answer?
0

Bad mistake! We now gonna have a entire class of crooks graduating in 6 months!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

About Layer 8

Layer 8 is Network World's daily home for the not-just-networking news.
Contact Layer 8

Layer 8 archive

RSS feed

Advertisement: