All spammers should be shot first and then given a fair trial!
Latest security headlines from Network World:
Microsoft to release four critical patches
How carriers batten down the hatches for hurricanes
Survey: VARs concerned about cybersecurity, health care
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary 
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
|
|
Why waste time on a trial?
They don't qualify as human so they're not entitled to a trial. Even if you do give them a trial, I see no reason to make it a fair one.
A friend of mine suggested that we publically execute 6-12 spammers as the SuperBowl half-time show every year. It would be much more entertaining than most of the half-time shows, and about a billion people would see it. Might be a useful deterent, but even if it's not, it would be entertaining.
Just a few thoughts.
The Spammer is from
The Spammer is from Malaysia? I'd settle to see him get 20 strokes from a cane and put a video of the event on U-Toob.