Cisco shareholders voted against a proposal requesting the networking giant refrain from selling products to governments that censor Web content from their citizens, according to a story in InformationWeek.
On Monday, Light Reading reported that Cisco investors were going to quiz Cisco at its annual shareholders' meeting Thursday about its business in repressive nations such as China and Saudi Arabia. InformationWeek Friday reported that shareholders voted against a proposal spearheaded by investment firm Boston Common Asset Management for Cisco to publish a report detailing how it would "reduce the likelihood that its business practices might enable or encourage the violation of human rights ..."
Voting for the resolution were 28.5%, while 21% abstained, reports InformationWeek.
It's great that Boston Common Asset Management called Cisco up on this, but as a shareholder, money talks louder than anything - even human rights, right? How many shareholders said they'd quit if some high street clothing retailers failed to stop shipping out work to countries that pay below minimum wage or employ child labor?
Go to Cisco Subnet for more Cisco news, blogs, discussion forums, security alerts, book giveaways, and more.
The Cisco Subnet blog is the official blog of the Network World Cisco Subnet community, managed by Editor Linda Leung. Cisco Subnet is the independent voice of Cisco customers and is your gateway to daily Cisco news, blogs, opinion, books, prize giveaways and more. Visit the Cisco Subnet home page daily and while you are there, subscribe to the Cisco Alert e-mail newsletter, which includes news and views generated by the Cisco Subnet community as well as Cisco-related stories on Network World and elsewhere on the Web.
(WAN community)
|
|
