Network World
Saturday, November 22, 2008
DNSstuff.com
Get information about your IP
IP Information
50+ On-demand DNS and network tools

Mitchell Ashley: Converging on Microsoft

Microsoft Subnet

Navigation

Is Red Hat trading it in for a Pilot's Cap?

New Red Hat CEO Jim Whitehurst

Sometimes you wonder "what were they thinking?" Red Hat's new CEO, Jim Whitehurst comes from Delta Airlines (five most recent years experience), "a petrochemical company, a manufacturing company, a trading company, a logistics company, a bank..." according to Michael Tiemann, the unintended defense man for Whitehurst's hiring into Red Hat's CEO job.

I'm a very big Red Hat fan, a company who has been making good numbers, most recently with a 28% increase in revenues during the 3rd quarter. (Matt Asay has a good summary on Red Hat's performance.)

But does Red Hat need a job hopping corporate type COO/CEO, or somebody who understands the software product business and the uniqueness of open source. Not to mention, open source software with all the software patent and IP protection wrangling that's sure to boil over in the years to come.

Is Jim Whitehurst here to negotiate a Novell-like deal between Microsoft and Red Hat? Is Jim here to put the smackdown on Novell or Oracle?

My guess is that Whitehurst was a quick solution to Red Hat CEO Matthew Szulik's need to step down due to family medical reasons. Maybe the RH board didn't want the CEO spot filled with a temporary replacement,or remain open too long. It's hard to say for sure.

I know that Matt Asay has said on his blog he is "willing to believe" but I have to say that I'm still perplexed and skeptical. No one's given a reasonable, more less compelling, explanation why Whitehurst is the right CEO to lead Red Hat's battle to increase market share of RH Linux.

Like this? Here are more recent posts.
Crapware Just As Susceptible To Security Vulnerabilities
Who Is An Interesting Person As A Podcast Guest?
An Electronic Christmas
Patch Tuesday In A Virtual Environment
Samba's Nose Allowed Under Microsoft Tent

Visit Microsoft Subnet for more news, blogs, opinion from around the Web.

Sign up for the bi-weekly Microsoft newsletter. (Click on News/Microsoft News Alert.)

Also check out Mitchell's personal blog The Converging Network and SSAATY Podcast.

 

Careless reading + no research = wrong conclusion

Useful answer?
0

Mitchell,

You wrote an entry using Stephen Shankland's blog as a reference. Stephen is a reputable guy, so I don't blame you for that. However, you did not read his quote of me correctly, leading you to conclude that Jim Whitehurst is a serial CEO who cannot hold a job. (What a strange accusation from somebody who proclaims themself to be a serial entrepreneur--but I digress.)

My original quote in question, which you could have referenced by clicking through on the link in Stephen's article was:

"But that's just because I have met hundreds of executives around the world representing every major industry and more than a few governments, and I've always been most impressed by those who tell me about the open source software they run at home and why. What a tragedy it would be to discount all that experience, all that knowledge, all that energy because the executive in question has a day job running a petrochemical company, a manufacturing company, a logistics company, a trading company, a bank, or a national government!"

I think you can see from the original quote that I was not talking about all the jobs that Jim had had in his career--he certainly was not President or Prime Minister of a sovereign nation prior to taking the job at Red Hat. Rather, the point that I made is that there are hundreds of high-achieving executives who have both the benefits of experience working in fields outside of open source software, as well as the knowledge of the value of open source in real-world situations. I endorsed the general idea of paying attention to broad, diverse, and authentic experience, not narrow-mindedly focusing on mere seniority in one single line of work. How strange to see that perverted into an incorrect conclusion that Mr. Whitehurst has had more carrers than The Great Imposter.

Sorry Michael, I think you've reached the wrong conclusion

Useful answer?
0

With all due respect Michael, I think you've missed the point made in my blog post. I'm not dis'ing Jim Whitehurst for his various experiences which you enumberated in your quote. I'm asking, where's the experience running a software product company???

Based on your statement, any quality executive who has used open source software in various capacities during their career is qualified to run an open source software product company. Respectfully, I don't agree - at all.

I want to see Red Hat continue to grow, prosper and bring competition in the marketplace. It is companies like Red Hat who force Microsoft and their products to be competitive. A healthy Red Hat means a healthy software market, and better products for IT and technology professionals to use.

I think if you re-read my blog post, you'll find that is the point I'm making. Check out the rest of the paragraph...

"But does Red Hat need a job hopping corporate type COO/CEO, or somebody who understands the software product business and the uniqueness of open source. Not to mention, open source software with all the software patent and IP protection wrangling that's sure to boil over in the years to come."

It's not too big of a stretch to ask why an executive with no software product experience should be running one of the best software companies in our industry.

If Jim has the software product business chops, lets hear about 'em.

I sincerely hope he does.

Mitchell Ashley

Converging Network, LLC
Personal blog: http://theconvergingnetwork.com
Personal podcast: http://www.clickcaster.com/ss

Separating concerns

Useful answer?
0

You wrote:

"With all due respect Michael, I think you've missed the point made in my blog post. I'm not dis'ing Jim Whitehurst for his various experiences which you enumberated in your quote. I'm asking, where's the experience running a software product company???"

My point was that the experiences that I attributed to him do not at all match the experiences that you say I did, and my consequential concern was that from an incorrect starting point, fallacy is the foregone conclusion.

As for the question of the software product company, I am glad you hold Red Hat in such high esteem, as do I. As I said in my blog posting, I don't have any privileged view of the future, but I do believe that his experiences will be highly relevant to a company that focuses as relentlessly on delivering customer value as Red Hat does.

Cheers,

M

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <i> <b> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <br /> <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

About Mitchell Ashley

Mitchell Ashley is principal consultant at Converging Network LLC where he provides product, technology and social media consulting to emerging technology companies. A successful CTO and product innovator, Mitchell has created many successful, award winning products in the networking, security, convergence, Internet and IT industries. In addition to blogging for NetworkWorld, Mitchell regularly blogs at TheConvergingNetwork and co-hosts the widely popular StillSecure After All These Years podcast.

RSS feed Subscribe to Mitchell Ashley's Converging on Microsoft feed

Mitchell Ashley's archive.

Microsoft Subnet

RSS feed Microsoft news RSS feed

The opinions expressed in this Weblog are those of the writer and may not represent the opinions of Network World.

Advertisement: