The number of probes the European Union has launched investigating Microsoft has increased to three, the Wall Street 
Journal reported on Friday. The EU began an investigation into Microsoft's activities over its attempt to get Office Open XML adopted as an International Standards Organization (ISO) standard. A story reported by InformationWeek quotes Microsoft critic Andrew Updegrove on the news:
"The investigation will be especially welcome in standards circles, due to the wide range of reports from the field that Microsoft has engaged in 'stacking' of the national committees that were voting on OOXML as well as other overreaching activities intended to influence the result" of standards voting, said Andrew Updegrove, a standards expert who has opposed the Microsoft effort in the past, in an e-mail."
Microsoft's efforts - the cause of this current investigation -- did not pay off. ISO did not choose to put OOXML on the fast-track for adoption as a standard. But the controversy surrounding the vote (and the standard itself) has been unceasing both before and since the vote. Among the more juicy alleged tactics are accusations that Microsoft employees resorted to bribery, that ISO committee members were fed false information, and the Microsoft manipulated the committees.
Last month, the uproar started again. Microsoft executives slammed IBM, saying IBM sabotaged the vote, ZDNet UK reported. IBM retorted to the slam (per Ars Technica article ), and Microsoft retorted to IBMs retort, Network World reported.
Nana-nana-boo-boo. The standards community has been doing a good job of mimicking a carload of cranky school-aged children.
So the EU, with its decidedly anti-Microsoft twist these days, will now investigate. It is also investigating antitrust accusations brought by Opera Software that Microsoft is competing unfairly in the browser market. And the EU is looking into how well Microsoft is following the EU's previous edict to make Windows communications protocols more available so that Windows works better with third-party applications. (It is that edict, urged along by the EU probe, that allowed Samba in December to license Windows documentation for $10K Euros - a boon to the open source community).Â
Go to Microsoft Subnet for more news, blogs, opinion.
More posts from Microsoft Subnet
A step by step on how to add a role to Server Core
How to get started with Server Core in WS2008
Let's Get Reacquainted & How to Optimize Windows Server 2008 for Branch Office Communications (Four Part Series)
Windows Server 2008 Management and Maintenance tips
Fabulous giveaways from Microsoft Subnet and Cisco Subnet All Micronet blog posts
Sign up for the bi-weekly Microsoft newsletter. (Click on News/Microsoft News Alert.)
The Microsoft Subnet blog is the official blog of the Network World's Microsoft Subnet community, and is written by Online Community editor Julie Bort. Microsoft Subnet is the independent voice of Microsoft customers and is your gateway to daily Microsoft news, blogs, opinion, books, prize giveaways and more. Visit the Microsoft Subnet index page daily, and while you are there, subscribe to the Microsoft newsletter. The newsletter includes news generated by the Microsoft Subnet community as well as other Microsoft news stories published by Network World.
The Leader in Network Knowledge
"Nana-nana-boo-boo. The
"Nana-nana-boo-boo. The standards community has been doing a good job of mimicking a carload of cranky school-aged children."
So, what does that make Microsoft in the face of their shenigans in various venues trying to stack the deck in favor of adoption of OOXML and then blaming IBM for the failure for it to be adopted on the fast track? Sounds like Microsoft needs to get their britches paddled and sent to bed without supper.
LOL, a paddle may be required
But that doesn't mean that the standards community needs to stoop to the level of bickering. How about if the standards community quits whining about it at this point? The fast-track vote didn't pass. Ultimate ISO acceptance of OOXML may never happen, and if it does, maybe that will be because it is document compatibility standard worth having. Microsoft's nasty politics have been exposed. The EU, eager to be seen as the world's corporate police -- they are on the warpath with Microsoft, plus Intel and others, too -- is on the watch. What possible purpose does continued finger pointing serve?
"Microsoft's nasty politics
"Microsoft's nasty politics have been exposed."
True. But they have not ceased.
-Wang-Lo.