Yesterday’s announcement by the retailer Hannaford looks to be the second largest credit card security breach in history. It is reported that some 4.2 million credit card numbers and expiration dates have been stolen. With unfortunate regularity companies are disclosing they are the latest victims of massive credit card or Personally Identifiable Information (PII) theft. This has gotten the attention of a few Insurance companies who, in response, have created a new insurance product called Privacy Breach Insurance. Companies like Chubb, AIG, and Executive Risk are betting that as the information theft problem continues to escalate, companies will increasingly turn to privacy insurance as a way to stave off the risk and reduce the financial impact of a privacy breach.
Quoting from one of AIG’s products, this type of insurance protects policy holders from; “the liability that arises when private or confidential information is put at risk due to failure of computer security or wrongful release or disclosure of information by the insured, the insured’s employee or another third party.” What I find very interesting, and even compelling, is that the protection is extended even if the privacy breach was the fault of a third party, i.e. business partner or hacker. Given that the majority of privacy breaches are perpetrated by third parties this makes the insurance offering viable.
AIG's security and privacy insurance offers coverage from the liability arising from the following: (Note: coverage from other insurance vendors are similar)
Privacy Breach insurance products offer policy holders all sorts of benefits. Here is just a sampling:
I’ll be watching to see if this insurance offering starts to gain momentum. And if it does will companies start to rely on it at the expense of vigorously defending their networks from intrusions. Not to say that companies will stop defending their networks, but will they be less vigorous of their defense given the protections they are being offered by their insurance carrier.
Additionally, if this insurance takes off and is successful will Insurance companies start to require companies to maintain a certain security posture and maintain security standards. Kind of like a PCI standards requirement for Insurance policy holders. If they do go down that road I just hope that the security standards they adopt are concise, meaningful, and precise. I’d like to hear from anyone who has purchased or looked at purchasing Privacy Insurance and what your experience was. So is this insurance offering a boon or bust for companies dealing with the risks of privacy breach?
For more info on the Hannaford breach see here:
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/031708-hannaford-data-breach.html
Jamey Heary, CCIE No. 7680, is a security consulting systems engineer at Cisco. He leads its Western Security Asset team and is a field advisor for Cisco's global security virtual team. Jamey is the author of the recently published Cisco NAC Appliance: Enforcing Host Security with Clean Access. His areas of expertise include network and host security design and implementation, security regulatory compliance, and routing and switching. His other certifications include CISSP, CCSP, and Microsoft MCSE. He is also a Certified HIPAA Security Professional. Jamey has been working in the IT field for 14 years and in IT security for 9 years.
|
|
It might..
It might be a short time boon. Insurance companies (most) do their homework. They know if a blond is more risky driving a truck than a person with dark hair, a needle worker is about the most risky and expensive to insure, etc - don't laugh, these are statistical studies they do and have done a long time time, they have more information than they can use. I didn't see the cover for a business loss - didn't actually wait it, insurance companies can be anything but stupid. Now, maybe, if other aspects are covered some companies think that the savings in security are worth of the business loss - public has a short memory so it is a short time loss, in some countries you can't lose your license even if you mess up to save money so no problems there, etc. I think it is shortsighted, the more we have these incidents, the better the public memory and the larger the business loss gets. And I think you better read the insurance contract very carefully, it may not cover what you thought.