Network World
Saturday, August 30, 2008
DNSstuff.com
Get information about your IP
IP Information
50+ On-demand DNS and network tools

Wendell Odom's Cisco Cert Zone

Cisco Subnet

Navigation

CCNP Lab 9 – ISCW and MPLS

I just forgot. Of all the CCNP exams, ISCW covers the broadest range of topics. When I covered ISCW a few weeks ago, I covered all the main ISCW topics, focusing on the security topics. But I just forgot MPLS. Any interestingly enough, as our survey has shown over the last few weeks, MPLS is one of the topics that more people want to hear about when this series is finished. So, before turning my attention to the bigger picture of what to put in a CCNP lab, I need to post a few comments about MPLS and the ISCW exam.

First, for those of you unfamiliar with MPLS, today "MPLS" is almost as big as saying "IP routing". There are a lot of useful functions provided by MPLS, and lots of familiar features that integrate with MPLS in order to provide those features. There are a lot of books devoted to MPLS, and frankly 1 volume can't cover it all even if the printer uses skinny paper.

All that begs the question - which chunk of MPLS do we care about today for ISCW? In my opinion, I think it's also worth asking the question about what to expect for the next revision of the CCNP exams.

Since we're talking labs here, I'll stick with all ISCW exam topics that require hands-on work. In the current exam topics, and in the authorized course's lab guide, that includes only frame-mode MPLS. With Frame Mode MPLS, the routers use a new protocol (LDP) to exchange MPLS label information about known IP routes, then adding/removing label headers that list those learned labels. It's relatively simple to configure once you know the basics of MPLS concepts.

For the possible next versions of the exams, if I had to guess, CCNP will include MPLS VPN configuration. MPLS VPN concepts are covered in the current ISCW authorized course materials - the course just doesn't include coverage of the MPLS VPN configuration, which can get involved in a hurry compared to just frame-mode MPLS. So, there's some benefit to planning to support MPLS VPN in your lab.

Now, for the good news for labbing: 2600's (non-XMs) support Frame Mode MPLS. (I actually used 2610's as the MPLS core in my lab when writing the MPLS coverage in my CCIE R/S written book.) In my case, I was using non-XM 2610s, 12.3 Mainline, Enterprise Plus feature set.

Unfortunately, I should give a big lawyer disclaimer here. That's what I've seen in my lab. However, your results may vary, check with your product vendor, etc etc. The reason is that the Cisco feature navigator says that the 2600's don't support MPLS. Let me summarize what I did:

  • Open www.cisco.com/go/fn
  • Searched on "features"
  • Chose "MPLS (Multiprotocol Label Switching)"
  • The next page's "model" pull-down doesn't list 2600's.

Following that process, the pull down list does include 2650/2651 XM's, 1841/1861, and 3640, to name a few. But the rest of the 2600 (XM and non-XM) models are not listed, plus 2500's, 800's, and 1700's are missing as well. So, it's up to you to decide the risk of buying something that's difficult to confirm from the feature navigator. Of course, particularly for folks in the USA, it's not a lot ($50-$100 including shipping) to get a used 2610 and convince yourself by seeing it live and in person.

Next, to support MPLS VPN, you'll need a better router than the 2600 non-XM models.

I do know from experience that using a 2600 non-XM as an MPLS VPN PE router won't work. With MPLS VPNs, the Provider Edge (PE) routers do a lot of the control plane work (all the fun stuff with routing protocols and MPLS), with the Provider (P) routers in the middle of the MPLS network doing less control plane work, focusing instead of forwarding packets. Using feature navigator, listing just the MPLS VPN base feature, the same models are listed as for just "MPLS" - 2650/2651, 1841/1861, 3640, among others, but none of the usual cheaper routers.

So, what to do for MPLS labbing for CCNP today? I think there's a few main options:

  • To support just frame-mode, if you trust that 2610's will work, use them -they're cheap. (2 minimum, 3 is better).
  • To support just frame-mode, but you're reluctant to believe in the 2610's, the 3640 option is the most cost effective to support just frame-mode MPLS.
  • If you're betting you'll want to do MPLS VPN configuration, look at the 3640 as a good price performer today
  • If you can jus tread about MPLS, and not have to do hands-on labs, it's actually a small configuration topic - so, you could just ignore it for lab work.

So, what have you folks seen? Any other models where you see MPLS working where it's not listed in the feature navigator? Other thoughts?

Where are we going Wendell?

Useful answer?
0

Hi Wendell

I have to ask, are we going somewhere with all these CCNP Lab discussions?

Are looking at some point in the future providing some Lab configurations and exercises, maybe a practical book even, aimed at the CCNP?

Cheers
Shaun

Well... if I did intend that...

Useful answer?
0

Shaun,

I could tell you, but then I'd have to...

Seriously, I hadn't thought about CCNP labs and practical that much until I started this blog. I spend most of my time writing around the CCNA and CCIE world. The interest in CCNP labs has gotten me thinking at least. So, whatta you think? If I were to do something, what should it include? This is just a pie-in-the-sky kind of question for now. No plans, and if I didn, or Cisco Press did, I of course couldn't say. I think it's clear that there's a need, but the question as usual whether there's enough $$ to those involved to make it a good project to pursue.

So... to more specifically answer your question about are we going somewhere...

The blog content has three main criteria - it has something to do with Cisco certs, it needs to be something that we think folks would have some interest, and (selfishly) I have to have at least some interest as well. So, there's no specific destination in mind with the blog, and I"m not doing all this lab discussion as prep for it ending up in a book. We had such a big response on the CCNA Lab stuff that my friends at Network World thought that CCNP labs would be a good topic - it's just bigger than CCNA, so it's taking me longer.

That said, I'm never opposed to kicking ideas about what books are needed out there - I find it interesting. Whatta you think?

Wendell

 

And, I'll end by making an unfortunate observation - if I ended up writing such a thing, I wouldn't be able to say it publicly until it's almost in-stock at the stores. So, my typical answer is "I can't say", and that really isn't implying that "I'm working on it but can't talk about it" or "I'm not working on it".

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

About Wendell Odom

Odom, CCIE No, 1624, splits time between writing books for Cisco Press and teaching classes for Skyline ATS. In his 25-ish years in the networking industry, he has worked as as a pre-sale and post-sale SE for a few networking vendors, as well as a network engineer implementing network technology. Wendell has spent the majority of the last 15 years teaching, consulting, and writing about networking technologies, most of which in some way relate to Cisco products. His books include titles on QoS, CCIE R/S, as well as several titles related to CCNA certification, including the September 2007 book CCNA Official Exam Certification Library (CCNA Exam 640-802) (Read a sneak peek of chapter 7). Click for the list of current titles by Wendell.

RSS feed XML feed

Wendell Odom archive.

Cisco Subnet

RSS feed Cisco news RSS feed

Advertisement: