If the goal of the project is better security by design, why the source tarballs are not e-signed? What kind of security is providing of anonymous code?
Just look at:
http://unbound.net./downloads/
Latest security headlines from Network World:
Microsoft trumpets security additons in upcoming IE8
SQL attacks lob onto tennis association Web site
Google gives away free Web-application security scanner
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary 
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
|
|
WTF is esigned ??
If you are going to complain about something .. dont make things up.
e-signed sounds like some marketing trademarked buzzword ..
djbdns
No mention is made of djbdns...
Appliances
Most appliances are based on BIND, including the Infoblox solution.
djbdns is great, but not free enough
I am a big fan of Dan Bernstein and a long time user of his software, but djbdns has specific restrictions that make community development problematic. Anyway, more free, secure and fast DNS software is always appreciated.
DJB released all his softwares under public domain
http://cr.yp.to/distributors.html
I've had good luck with SimpleDNS.com on Windows Server
I've had good luck with SimpleDNS.com on Windows Server. I don't have tons of traffic, but I do have a few hundred domains in my two Internet nameservers. The new version of Simple DNS is even quicker supposedly, because it runs on SQL Server.
The same company has a Simple Failover product that works with Simple DNS as well.