Network World
Saturday, November 22, 2008
DNSstuff.com
Get information about your IP
IP Information
50+ On-demand DNS and network tools

Teach yourself WS2008

Microsoft Subnet

Navigation

Will There Be Enough Bandwidth and How Much Will It Cost?

With the price of gasoline sky rocketing, I would imagine that many IT and "info" workers would opt to telecommute as much as possible in the coming months, particularly this summer. Having written quite a bit about VPNs over the last couple of years including Microsoft's Windows Server 2008 VPN server capabilities in my latest book, I have always been partial to VPN connections to secure networks as a remote network access strategy rather than dial-up schemes that require a modem pool. The question is: will an increase use of Internet bandwidth eventually lead to increase bandwidth costs and a tiered access and delivery system?

Now I'm not saying that telecommuting alone is going to bring the Internet to a grinding halt. But a new way of charging for Internet connections has been advocated by a number of telecommunication companies that would base Internet use charges on the amount of data sent or received on the Internet system by a particular Internet connection.

Gasoline prices are certainly tied to a supply and demand economic model (although some of you might disagree with me) and I was wondering over the weekend if Internet bandwidth will also follow this same suite as the Web 2.0 concept rolls out and Internet users, particularly on the Web, chew up more and more bandwidth. I think you would have to agree that the current economic model on the Web (in terms of making money) is related to the number of hits that a particular Website gets. The money is actually generated by advertising. This is why Google makes tons of money (via advertising) and every for profit site on the Web looks for ways to increase the amount of traffic they get on their sites. So, the more bandwidth used by visitors to a particular site the better it is for that site (in terms of profit)

So, as folks on the Web use more Internet bandwidth (via popular Web social utilities such as Facebook and YouTube) and more info workers move data over VPNs will Telecom companies and cable television companies begin to scream for a tiered system (and higher Internet connection charges), citing the need to recoup the costs of existing Internet infrastructure investments and the future costs of laying high-speed fiber optic lines? So bottom line: will Internet bandwidth go the same way as gasoline in terms of pricing? What do you think?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <i> <b> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <br /> <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

About Joe Habraken

RSS feed Blog archive.

Joe Habraken is an information technology and new media professional with more than 15 years of professional experience in the information technology and digital media production fields. Joe is a best selling author and his recent books include Sams Teach Yourself Windows Server 2008 in 24 Hours, Home Wireless Networking in a Snap, Skinning Windows XP, and Sams Teach Yourself Networking in 24 Hours (with Matt Hayden). Joe is currently an associate professor at the University of New England in Biddeford, ME. He holds both Microsoft and Cisco certifications and serves as an IT consultant, curriculum designer and software instructor.

Enter to win one of 15 copies of Sams Teach Yourself Windows Server 2008 in 24 Hours.

Read a free chapter of Sams Teach Yourself Windows Server 2008 in 24 Hours. Check out Microsoft Subnet's entire library of free chapters.

Microsoft Subnet

RSS feed Microsoft news RSS feed

The opinions expressed in this Weblog are those of the writer and may not represent the opinions of Network World.

Advertisement: