What makes a user, Gibson Guitar, change its mind on Cisco UC gear and go with Microsoft instead? This is more a case of the classic Microsoft shop sticking with what it knows than a big wide statement on Cisco or its UC technology. Gibson had Microsoft stuff, so adding OCS was relatively painless. Both Microsoft and Cisco are picking off the low-hanging fruit with unified communications right now. The battle will get really interesting when they duke it out for customers that don't mind mixing and matching. A case study story reported by Network World says:
Gibson Guitar last year abandoned a rollout of Cisco gear and tapped into its existing Microsoft infrastructure to build a unified communications system of voice, e-mail and instant messaging. The company upgraded to the 2007 versions of Office Communications Server (OCS), Exchange Server, Office Communicator and Office Outlook to create a centrally deployed and managed platform that will eventually service 600 users. "What it came down to for us is that we were already running all these Microsoft products so it did not make sense to switch," says Kevin Wing, senior network engineer for Gibson. "For the entire rollout, we only bought one additional server."
This case study is part of a bigger package of stories covering the Cisco vs. Microsoft battle on the UC front by Network World. (A side-by-side comparison of the technologies and user case studies comes complete with slide-show.) Cisco's approach to unified communications is obviously hardware centric. It sees UC as a network-based, hardware-intensive platform that can be extended to support for more environments – like point-of-sale systems, non-PC workgroups and mobile device platforms. Microsoft's UC approach is obviously software-centric. It marries voice, e-mail, instant messaging, presence, and video conferencing into a suite of software communication tools anchored by Office Communications Server (OCS) 2007.
With these two giants fighting it out, the customer wins. Not only will this create pricing pressure, but it will also create completely different architectural approaches to UC, rather than a commodity, one-size-fits all market.
Go to the Microsoft Subnet home page for more news, blogs, podcasts.
More Microsoft Subnet blog posts:
Windows Safari users at high risk for attack
A Microsoft "Live" search bar on HP PCs
More appeals filed over OOXML, Brazil joins South Africa, India
Windows 7 preview
Six free security tools you shouldn't live without
The Microsoft Subnet blog is the official blog of the Network World's Microsoft Subnet community, managed by editor Julie Bort. Microsoft Subnet is the independent voice of Microsoft customers and is your gateway to daily Microsoft news, blogs, opinion, books, prize giveaways and more. Visit the Microsoft Subnet index page daily, and while you are there, subscribe to the Microsoft newsletter. The newsletter includes news generated by the Microsoft Subnet community as well as other Microsoft news stories published by Network World.
(OS community)
(Microsoft RSS feed)
The opinions expressed in this Weblog are those of the writer and may not represent the opinions of Network World.
|
|
UC alternatives that leverage Microsoft
I can understand the desire to explore Cisco and Microsoft for UC applications. However, many customers would benefit from exploring alternatives to the two big names. Companies like ShoreTel are developing user friendly, cost effective and easy to deploy VoIP and UC products as alternatives and even complements to Microsoft and Cisco.
ShoreTel 8, the latest software release, offers full integration with Microsoft OCS to provide presence and chat capabilities. It even supports one-on-one video conferencing out of the box.
Don't forget about the players in the market who provide innovation and offer user friendly alternatives to the giants of the industry.
Chris Cameron
http://accentservices.blogspot.com
Post new comment