Have we all just become armslength cisco employees', sure sounds like it.. It is difficult to provide a perfect secure environment without being totally proprietary as much as we dream about universal standards. However this article is poor, and who pays who? It is first just a new name, "I Like It"....not. Another Cisco ploy, just keep the ball in the air a little longer and we gain a little more market share. I guess it takes little to impress some people who know a little less.
|
Does Verizon's Voyager stack up to the iPhone? |
|
|
5 IT skills that won't boost your salary 
[1,407]
Women 4 times more likely than men to cough up personal info [589]
Japan's 10 funniest tech-related commercials [Videos] [407]
Throwing away a promo CD is "unauthorized distribution"? [1,265]
Adults too quick to dismiss educational video games [682]
Attack of the iPhone clones [Slideshow] [578]
10 things IT needs to know about AJAX [1,258]
This Year's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries [Slideshow] [409]
|
|
Mobility - enable network
More vaporware, lets see it
Motion architecturally disabled
Cisco’s recent Motion vision announcement (and related ‘phase 0’ product announcement of a glorified location-based WiFi controller) raises more questions than it answers.But the biggest question in my mind is that Motion is an architectural no-man’s land.
See why:
http://blog.tmcnet.com/the-hyperconnected-enterprise/mobility/cisco-motion-sickness.asp
Post new comment