So I was talking with a client recently about some forecast work we'd done on wireless technologies and markets, and a new question came up: how will the current energy crisis affect mobility going forward? This is a fair and indeed an important concern. Deriving an answer needs to begin with a look at whether the current crisis is a bubble or other aberration, or a fundamental sea change. If it's the former, oil could return to a more reasonable $50-$100/barrel as the speculators lose their shirts (because of a falloff in demand due to customers simply balking, or perhaps a short squeeze). If not, however, and energy costs stay high, will such spur the development of a replacement for oil that could potentially be substantially cheaper, or will high prices remain the norm forever?
The answer, of course, lies in the cause of the problem, but that is very difficult to diagnose. The OPEC countries aren't exactly charities, and constraining supply under conditions of accelerating demand is an excellent way to drive up prices. The oil companies are making record profits. We don't seem to have enough refining capacity even if we could pump more oil. And, of course, the high costs involved in exploration and those pesky environmentalists who seek to restrict where we can drill both contribute to the problem.
Bottom line, at least from my perspective: this is a long-term problem. Standards of living will fall, at least modestly. Economic growth will slow, and globally. These effects, however, will be relatively short-lived, perhaps 10-15 years. Research into new energy sources will accelerate, and more efficient techniques across the board for using energy will emerge as well. Both air pollution and global warming will be modestly addressed. Sure, some industries will really take a hit, but that's what happens in properly-functioning economies. We deal with the problem. We progress and move on. This won't be easy, but it's not the end of the world.
So, how does all this affect mobility and demand for mobile products? WRT the former, a lot. We'll fly and drive less. Less time on airplanes is, IMHO, a good thing, as the experience of flying is now unpleasant at best. But local mobility will be only modestly affected. Most people will still drive to the grocery store, to visit Aunt Ruth, and to go to the office, and more will do so by public transportation where available. The situation is not so bad, and, indeed, cannot get so bad that we will fundamentally stay at home all the time. That's counter to our nature.
So I see no impact on the cellular industry here at all. None. Another billion handsets will be sold over the next year. This will, however, be accompanied by an accelerating falloff in demand for landline telephony services. There is, after all, less money to spend, and who needs two phone numbers, anyway? And I see very little impact on enterprise WLAN sales, although there will be slightly less demand for office space and more people working out of their homes, so this is potentially a long-term issue. Correspondingly, though, I see no problems with the residential WLAN space, which, if anything, will see good growth from people who, again, spend more time at home.
We're basically a pretty smart species, and the current crisis will motivate that greatness within us that does indeed surface from time to time. And mobile communications will remain a key element as the economy makes the transition.
Mathias is a principal at Farpoint Group, a wireless advisory firm in Ashland, Mass.
Couldn't be more incorrect
Unfortunately, we've been working with bad numbers and it's become clear that our ability to extract oil at 86 million barrels a day is coming to an end.
Peak oil discovery was in 1963. Since then we have been finding less oil every decade than the decade before. We have been drawing down our reserves and we're now at the halfway point of the easy-to-extract oil. As production declines, the economy will be sent into a tailspin and we'll soon have wave after wave of unemployed. This happens in every oil shock and makes sense when you consider that every $10 increase in the price of a barrel of oil means $76 billion is removed from the U.S. economy.
World GDP growth has been lowered by the World bank four times in the last five months and will soon go negative (it's now pegged at about 1%.) U.S. GDP growth is already negative but it won't show up in the numbers for another few months.
If you think the situation with oil is something that won't have a lasting impact on us, I recommend that you do some research.
Try this page for a start:
www.postpeakliving.com/peak-oil-primer
Then take the UnCrash Course and start getting ready. This is a very different world we're moving into.
-André
Excellent Points, But...
It's not clear that we will run out of oil anytime soon, only that it is going to be expensive from now on. There is enough oil to support limited mobility, but not the free-spending ways of even the recent past. I wouldn't want to be in the travel business today; videoconferencing is about to become as common as air travel used to be. Now, we may in fact have hundreds of years of oil left, or even more. But it's become just too expensive, and, I agree, the global economy is going to take a near-term (again 10-15 years) hit.
So we should be researching alternative energy at a feverish pace now. The lack of a national energy policy is causing real harm across the board. We should in fact have begun both the policy and technical work on a big scale back in the early '70s during what many call the first oil shock (the embargo). This effort will accelerate now, I hope. The benefits are potentially many, although the geopolitics of raw materials (just as is the case with oil, BTW) will almost certainly rear its head here as well. Political instability is in fact a bigger threat that even the environmental damage done from buring oil, but hopefully cool heads will prevail.
The world is not coming to an end anytime soon. But the handwriting is on the wall, and it's up to us. And the point of my note was that the mobile industry will see little if any effect from all of this, in the near term, anyway.
Thank your for the note!
Craig.
A few distinctions
Hi, Craig.
Thanks for the reply.
Some of what you say is valid, but let me mention a few things that I think you're missing:
I respectfully suggest that if you are worried about a near-term oil shock (which the International Energy Agency has said will come before 2012), you don't yet have a full picture of the oil world.
-André
Correction
Please read the last sentence as :
I respectfully suggest that if you are not worried about a near-term oil shock (which the International Energy Agency has said will come before 2012), you don't yet have a full picture of the oil world.