Here's an interesting idea that could either be a stroke a genius or rather lame. Cisco, IBM, Intel, Juniper and Microsoft today announced that they 
have formed a consortium to address multi-product security threats. If it works, it will be a source of vendor cooperation that stops the finger pointing. Instead of a not-our-problem attitude by individual vendors, the united group will march into the dark underworld and crush complex multi-product attacks as if stepping on oh-so-many cockroaches.
Or not.
The announcement also has all the makings of a PR maneuver with no substance behind it. First off -- they formed a consortium? Consortiums are so 1980's aren't they? Born of an era where software code was not only proprietary but a closely guarded secret they were the only way a company could cooperate with its rivals was to form in-between partnerships. On the positive side, this group of vendors, which call their new partnership the Industry Consortium for Advancement of Security on the Internet (ICASI), do seem to be the ones the hot seat most often with security attacks. But look at the names NOT on the list. None of the major security vendors are there (Symantec? Check Point?) nor are other industry players also fending off lots of attacks... Apple, Sun, Adobe, Mozilla.
More questions: Why the need for a new group with a new name? There are already countless global Internet security research firms and security storm centers and whatnot. Why not simply fund and cooperate with one of them? Plus, all of these five vendors already have long-standing and complex co-opetition relationships with one another. Couldn't they (and haven't they) always worked with one another to solve security issues?
It is also hard not to wonder if Cisco was a driving force in this. This group was formed and announced during a time when Cisco has been pounded by security scrutiny. Since May 1, Cisco has issued 11 Security Advisories, many covering multiple holes. It has also fended off its first theoretical rootkit attack. In other words, the company's gear is now on the radar of both attackers and security researchers and it is not a comfortable position to be in. (Hey, Cisco, welcome to Microsoft's world.)
Still, skepticism aside, if the group works as advertised it will be a big score for the good guys.
More from Cisco Subnet:
Cisco Security: patches now available for Cisco VoIP holes
Cisco's growth path
Padmasree Warrior cries: Innovation through collaboration!
Nexus vs. Catalyst 6500
Cisco's vision for the virtual data center
Free books, training, gift certificates -- giveaways for June from Cisco Subnet
Go to Cisco Subnet for more Cisco news, blogs, discussion forums, security alerts, book giveaways, and more.
The Cisco Subnet blog is written by Network World managing editor Jim Duffy and is the official blog of Network World's Cisco Subnet community. The Cisco Subnet site is managed by Online Community Editor Julie Bort. Cisco Subnet is the independent voice of Cisco customers and is your gateway to daily Cisco news, blogs, opinion, books, prize giveaways and more. Visit the Cisco Subnet home page daily and while you are there, subscribe to the Cisco Alert e-mail newsletter, which includes news and views generated by the Cisco Subnet community as well as Cisco-related stories on Network World and elsewhere on the Web.
The Leader in Network Knowledge
haha,may be you are right
Maybe Cisco said to juniper. "How are you in security area, after you buy Netscreen?"
Juniper said , customer told me " Hey, you are a Network gear vendor".
After a moment, Cisco said let's go. An OS frind , and
an Host frind want to have a lunch with us.