Network World
Friday, November 21, 2008
DNSstuff.com
Get information about your IP
IP Information
50+ On-demand DNS and network tools

Nearpoints

Navigation

Wi-Fi in Cars: Going Nowhere Fast

This is not a good time to be in the automobile business, especially in the US. High oil prices mean, of course, high gas prices, which mean less driving but also higher costs for everything else, all of which mean less money to spend on things like cars. As I previously noted, we're in for some rough sledding over the next few years, until research into alternative energy yields positive results - and it will, he said optimistically. As an engineer I am always optimistic, but as a nation and a planet we have waited a bit too long to get started here - hence the rough sledding. In the near term, over the next 10-15 years or so, we need to use alternative fuels, particularly nuclear, to generate electricity, and reserve liquid fossil fuels for vehicles. Beyond that, who knows? There are so many good ideas floating around; we just need the right incentives to pursue the necessary research, and I believe it's quite obvious that these now exist.

Still, the automakers gotta sell what they have today, and they have two key strategies to do so. The first is to add new features that make the purchase of a new car as irresistible as possible (nav comes to mind; that worked for me, along with a six-speed), and second, since the advent of GM's OnStar, to provide value-added services (sound familiar, IT folks?) that simultaneously yield recurring revenue from what used to be a once-every-few-years purchase. Along these lines, we've see fairly involved in-vehicle communications products in addition to OnStar, like Ford's deployment of Microsoft's Sync, and now Chrylser's UConnect.

Chrysler today augmented UConnect with Wi-Fi service, effectively turning the car into an AP with router connectivity to a wireless WAN. The cost is around US$500 plus monthly service. But as much as I truly love wireless and Wi-Fi, it would be hard for me to recommend this product. For most enterprise types, a better solution would be to buy a notebook with a built-in WWAN connection, or an add-on PC Card or ExpressCard or USB adapter, or, better yet, tethered access using an appropriate handset, the most cost-effective solution of all. One also gets to pick one's carrier this way, which could be important is getting the best deal, or if one wants to go with WiMAX. And if you want to provide connectivity for everyone, consider a Wi-Fi travel router or a soft AP. Both are cheap.

The design of the Chrysler Wi-Fi product undoubtedly began long before this year's energy crisis, and, again, you gotta sell what you have today. But I think the car companies should turn their attention to designing and building less-expensive cars that get better gas mileage rather than piling on expensive services designed to consume dollars that consumers no longer have. And, regardless, most people who need this kind of connectivity will more likely get it from, as I noted above, notebooks and handsets with WWAN cards or one form or another, or via handsets and tethered access. While it would be swell to be able to download a movie into one's car and give passengers with a notebook Wi-Fi access while heading to the Ritz-Carlton for a weekend retreat, shrinking household budgets aren't going to support volume deployment of this kind of capability.

More utility to these AP's than you think

Useful answer?
0

My company has been designing and building these Cellular WiFi AP's since 2004 and I can tell you that using a cellular modem with a laptop is just a subset of the functionality a Cellular WiFi AP offers, typically underperforms bandwidth wise, and leaves the end user to figure out how to keep a connection up as they travel through various carriers, especailly outside major urban areas.

The WiFI AP units deployed in a passenger vehicle are as much for the passengers (when the vehicle is moving or parked) than the driver (when parked). Having multiple PC's able to be connected and not have to deal with what can become complex issues of establishing and maintaining a mobile broadband connection is critical for family wide usability. While I don't mind fussing with cellular issues, my wife and kids don't have the knowledge or desire to. The WiFi AP solves the problem.

Performance is another issue. While EVDO and 3G support broadband data rates, most cell phones don't have the CPU power to pump that data through to a laptop without a performance loss. With a Cellular WiFi AP, they can be tuned for maxium throughput.

Usage scenarios I have enjoyed with a Cellular WiFi AP:
* Family road trips where one laptop is being used by a navigator, looking up info, digging up history on an area, while the kids surf or listen to streaming audio.
* Bring the AP with us into hotel rooms and plug into the wall with an AC adapter for internet access in the room.
* Provide WiFi to many of the campsites around us when camping.
* When touring around looking at real estate, having customers be able to connect in the vehicle with their laptop and drill down on details of the houses and neighborhoods.
* Using the AP for backup in the home or small office when the wired internet gets knocked out.

This is just a portion of a much longer list of interesting use cases this technology enables.

In an information and experience based economy, these AP's make for a compelling product.

Hey, I'm not saying these

Useful answer?
0

Hey, I'm not saying these things are useless, just that the auto companies should focus on adding value to the basic mission of the vehicle and spend less time trying to vacuum recurring revenue out of our pockets. How about lower prices, better fuel efficiency, and lower TCO to start?

And I agree with you that the performance of a dedicated Wi-Fi/cellular router will often be better than using a cell phone, but how much better? Do you have any benchmark data? I think most people would be better served with software running on a notebook that provides soft AP/router functionality with a WWAN adapter of one's choice. That way we'll pay only one monthly charge and have far greater utility than with the dedictaed case. I also worry about this functionality being just another distraction, and possibly leading to operator safety problems - but I suppose that could happen with the non-dedicated implementation as well.

All of the applications you note could be done via technology that is not integrated into the car. And note that sharing a connection with unrelated parties could be a violation of one's agreement with the cellular provider, at least in some cases.

And I think we're about to become an energy-centric economy, with information and experience coming a little closer to home regardless...

Thank you for the note!

Craig.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <i> <b> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <br /> <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

About Craig Mathias

Mathias is a principal at Farpoint Group, a wireless advisory firm in Ashland, Mass.

RSS feed

Craig Mathias's archive.

Wireless Research Center.

Advertisement: