Network World
Friday, September 5, 2008
DNSstuff.com
Get information about your IP
IP Information
50+ On-demand DNS and network tools

A World of Bytes

Navigation

It's time to outsource your e-mail to Google

If you outsource your email to your web hosting company, you definitely should move it to Google instead. If you run your email servers internally, you should at least take a hard look at the Google option.

My views on this are shaped in no small part by a leading independent e-mail analysis firm, Ferris Research. Ferris not only recommended moving to Google, they followed their own advice and moved themselves. Based on their recommendations, I followed suit.

Basic reasons for moving to Google include:

  • The price is right (cheap or even free).
  • Besides saving hardware, power, space, and software license fee costs, you also should have reduced administrative burdens.
  • Google has very solid anti-spam, based on the Postini acquisition. By the way, large scale helps with anti-spam filtering, and obviously few e-mail hosts are bigger than Google. Specifically, scale helps you recognize spam in the most basic way – you see lots of very similar messages show up in a lot of different mailboxes.
  • Due to both scale and security technology, Google is much safer against e-mail flood attacks than a typical web host, and even safer than an in-house solution. Since I've been hit with flood attacks twice in the past year and a half, I'm very sensitive to that one. (The goal was apparently to overload and compromise my web servers. The second one succeeded. I'm now at my third hosting company in that period.)
  • A performance or security problem elsewhere at a web host can bring down your e-mail. Not so with Google, although its uptime isn't perfect either.

Related links:

I am shocked

Useful answer?
0

You are recommending outsourcing business email to Google!!! Have you read the terms of use, especially the following? Are you out of your mind?

11. Content licence from you
11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive licence to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. This licence is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Additional Terms of those Services.
11.2 You agree that this licence includes a right for Google to make such Content available to other companies, organizations or individuals with whom Google has relationships for the provision of syndicated services, and to use such Content in connection with the provision of those services.
11.3 You understand that Google, in performing the required technical steps to provide the Services to our users, may (a) transmit or distribute your Content over various public networks and in various media; and (b) make such changes to your Content as are necessary to conform and adapt that Content to the technical requirements of connecting networks, devices, services or media. You agree that this licence shall permit Google to take these actions.
11.4 You confirm and warrant to Google that you have all the rights, power and authority necessary to grant the above licence.

Google's terms of service

Useful answer?
0

That would be, I presume, from http://www.google.com/accounts/TOS?hl=en, where it also says:

9.4 Other than the limited license set forth in Section 11, Google acknowledges and agrees that it obtains no right, title or interest from you (or your licensors) under these Terms in or to any Content that you submit, post, transmit or display on, or through, the Services, including any intellectual property rights which subsist in that Content (whether those rights happen to be registered or not, and wherever in the world those rights may exist).

That doesn't strike me as bad, although earlier versions were indeed as horrible as you're implying.

 

Funny you should mention this now....

Useful answer?
0

We are in one of our outages with Google based corporate email. We don't use it, but some companies we deal with do. Every month or so, for no know reason (at least not one Google will tell us) all mail gets delayed until the eventual NDR comes in. Some of it actually gets delivered, but we still get the NDR. Log files say "Communications error with host" or something close to that. I am not in the server room right now. As a Sys Admin (including our own in house Exchange server) I would find this totally unacceptable. And I am not on some little ISP with poor connectivity... we use Cogent as our ISP. So I think I'll wait to switch to Google until it allows its users appear a little less unprofessional.

Google can't match the responsiveness of local mail

Useful answer?
0

Another disadvantage that you don't mention is that outsourced email just isn't as pleasant to use as email that is hosted on a local server. When the mail server is remote, there are annoying delays when you open a message, delete a message, switch to another message, open an attachment... they're small, but repeated many many times over the course of a day. Locally hosted mail comes to you at LAN speed, not internet speed.

Locally hosted?

Useful answer?
0

Good point.  Local hosting may have a speed advantage if:

  • Most employees work in one location.
  • Most employees don't read their email in client software.

 

Best Client for Google Access

Useful answer?
0

You're right about the problems of a web interface. The trick is to use POP or IMAP for access, and then use your favorite rich client. I personally use Thunderbird.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

About Curt Monash

Curt Monash is a leading analyst of and strategic advisor to the software industry. Praised by Lawrence J. Ellison for his "unmatched insight into technology and marketplace trends," Curt was the software/services industry's #1 ranked stock analyst while at PaineWebber, Inc., where he served as a First Vice President until 1987. He subsequently co-founded Evernet, Inc., a $40 million networking systems integrator. Since 1990, he has owned and operated Monash Research, an analysis and advisory firm covering software-intensive sectors of the technology industry. In that period he also has been co-founder, president, or chairman of several other technology startups.

Curt has served as a strategic advisor to many well-known firms, including Oracle, Microsoft, SAP, AOL, CA, and Netezza. Curt earned a Ph.D. in mathematics (Game Theory) from Harvard University. He has held faculty positions in mathematics, economics and public policy at Harvard, Yale, and Suffolk universities.

RSS feed

A World of Bytes archive.

Advertisement: