Network World
Saturday, November 22, 2008
DNSstuff.com
Get information about your IP
IP Information
50+ On-demand DNS and network tools

Microsoft Subnet Blog

Microsoft Subnet

Navigation

Microsoft, it's time to officially rescind the Linux lawsuit threats

At this point in the game, Microsoft should really come clean with a statement that rescinds its Linux/patent/suing threat altogether. Granted, Microsoft put itself in a hard spot with this one, since it had its channel singing the same tune for those murky months after the threat. If it stands up says, "Sorry, just kidding!" that won't make the channel partners happy, particularly if they used the threat to convince customers they must buy SUSE or Windows over Red Hat and other distros. But the fact is, we are seeing actions by Microsoft that indicate that the "suing Linux users" jig is up.

These actions have been accelerating during Bill Gates's lame duck year, and certainly since the European Union slapped Microsoft with enormous fines for failing to make its protocols more readily available to other software makers. For instance, Microsoft has been making well publicized financial contributions to various open source projects such as Apache Software Foundation and the Open Source Census.

But more telling of how Microsoft is trying to change its attitude (and its image) is how it has begun to openly contribute to popular projects. It is one of the contributors to Zend Framework (albeit, so are 400 others, including Google). It intends to support Zend on Microsoft's identity platform, CardSpace. Plus this week, Microsoft also said it planned to support and contribute in big way to Zend's rival Ruby on Rails. The announcement, made during O'Reilly Open Source Convention, according to eWeek, was fairly inclusive. Microsoft will be sending its IronRuby implementation to be hosted on GitHub, the site that hosts the rest of the Ruby project. It will create an area called IronRuby-Contrib for all code that doesn't ship with the standard Iron-Ruby distribution that is covered by its own Microsoft Public License. It will ship all standard Ruby libraries as part of the IronRuby distribution. Plus, it will relieve suspicions that this is just another attempt to appear to be cooperating while secretly trying to control by participating in RubySpec. RubySpec is the benchmarks that tests Ruby distributions for compliance.

The Microsoft Public License is one of those weird aberrations stemming from the days of threats. (Microsoft, why not just allow your open source software to be covered by the licenses that all the other coders use?) But given the complexity of Microsoft IP, it is a small price to pay for the software giant moving in the right, cooperative direction. The project's lead at Microsoft, John Lam, admits that these are baby steps towards a better relationship with the open source world. But he makes a good point in saying that, weird licensing or not, it also sets a precedent for other groups within the company that want to openly use and contribute to open source projects.

Now, Ruby isn't Linux. And Microsoft has a clear business need to be involved in creating the next generation of Web application frameworks and a clear business need to be fighting operating system competitors. But official involvement in popular open source projects is the most impressive evidence yet that the "we'll sue you!" threat is now an empty one.

Visit the Microsoft Subnet home page for more news, blogs, podcasts.
More blog post from the Microsoft Subnet posts:
IT jobs hold strong in a weak economy, report says
Cheating is Cheating and the punishment should be the same for those caught!
5 free PowerShell tools to ease your Windows management pain
Users prefer Cisco NAC over Microsoft NAP, researchers say

Microsoft, it's time to officially rescind the Linux lawsuit...

Useful answer?
0

I can't think of one thing that MS has done that was without a motive for market advantage and continued dominance. I agree that it's time for them to rescind the threat. Especially if they want people to view their overtures to collaborate with the OSS community as sincere.

But they won't. They have clearly and relentlessly demonstrated that they are a company that does not think about concepts like what is right or wrong, what is legal or illegal. Their one area of innovation has been in getting around laws to extend their control and expand their market.

They are not to be trusted now or ever. The OSS community has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that it can replace most of the proprietary software with better software that is better maintained. And when combined with the Linux OS, it's much more secure and cost-effective.

There is one thing that MS is while it continues to produce its proprietary software. It's irrelevant.

By contrast, other proprietary software companies like Adobe, are not irrelevant. And if they continue to respond to the market the way they are currently, they never will be.

Open contributors?

Useful answer?
0

I would be wary about Microsoft's motives when contributing to open source projects such as Zend and would assume that their contributions only address improving the project's ability to run on the Windows platform.

I find myself totally distrustful of anything that Microsoft does, especially any perceived positive interaction with the open source community. And I agree with the top poster's comment; they have become completely irrelevant.

Ahhh, but if Microsoft were

Useful answer?
0

Ahhh, but if Microsoft were completely irrelevant as you suggest, you would not have found yourself reading this article or feeling the need to comment on it...

Ahhh, I guess they are a little relevant

Useful answer?
0

Sure, Microsoft still retains some relevancy in their potential ability to bring innovation to a halt with patent lawsuits, which is what the headline was about.

They also hold monopoly control of the web browser and desktop OS markets, even after 8 years of no significant improvements, which also makes them relevant. (Although Firefox and Apple are starting to take advantage of the situation.)

But as a developer, I find myself less and less interested in Microsoft's development tools, even though some are very cool from a technological perspective. They always seem to find a way of locking you in, and there are plenty of adequate (and often free) alternatives out there.

Screw Microsoft...

Useful answer?
0

They're like a pile of dogshit. It smells so just step around it and don't get any of it on your shoes.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <i> <b> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <br /> <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

More Microsoft resources

RSS feed

RSS feed

The Microsoft Subnet blog is the official blog of the Network World's Microsoft Subnet community, managed by editor Julie Bort. Microsoft Subnet is the independent voice of Microsoft customers and is your gateway to daily Microsoft news, blogs, opinion, books, prize giveaways and more. Visit the Microsoft Subnet index page daily, and while you are there, subscribe to the Microsoft newsletter. The newsletter includes news generated by the Microsoft Subnet community as well as other Microsoft news stories published by Network World.

(OS community)
RSS feed (Microsoft RSS feed)

The opinions expressed in this Weblog are those of the writer and may not represent the opinions of Network World.

Advertisement: