At the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, in Richland, Wash., “lean provisioning” has turned into a virtualization must-have, said Daryl Anderson, portfolio manager for application and data hosting/housing at the lab, in a recent interview. Lean provisioning is similar to thin provisioning, an increasingly popular feature of storage virtualization that allows automated resource provisioning across a storage area network. This U.S. Department of Energy lab has been using lean provisioning, its own version of thin provisioning made possible by the LSI storage appliance it uses, for more than a half a dozen years. While this process is more manual than today’s thin provisioning, PNNL is still realizing savings, Anderson says. “We give our customers just the amount of storage they need, and then they can come back and ask for more and we can grow it for them” rather than wasting space set aside for projected growth, he says. Other critical capabilities include the ability to copy and/or migrate data from one place to another – live, with no server downtime – and snapshots, for quick recovery from system corruptions. Additionally, Anderson says, the appliance allows PNNL to remain vendor agnostic on the storage side because it supports heterogeneous environments. Overall, he says, “storage virtualization nowadays is a pretty critical part of being able to manage large amounts of storage while maintaining flexibility, reliability and experience cost savings.” PNNL, for example, supports today’s 80TB of virtualized storage with the same number of system engineers – essentially one and a half – as it did when the lab brought in the storage appliance and had only 2.6TB of virtualized storage.
By Steve (not verified) on Tue, 08/19/2008 - 8:20am.
Whether using VDI, XenDesktop, or even Citrix Presentation server, our users had been left with issues centered around their Windows Profiles. These new technologies have the side effect of taking the personalization out of Windows. This not only creates issues for worker productivity but also creates an administration and support nightmare.
We overcame the problem with Entrigue's Script Start ProfileUnity.
I think you should add this as an essential virtual must have, especially on the desktop side.
The solution enabled us to make all of our virtual desktops stateless so at logon every Windows session is personalized for the user within seconds. Drives are mapped, users' personalized settings (including Outlook signatures, wallpaper, spellchecker, etc.) is pulled through. The solution is granular by design which allows for logons to be really quick.
I honestly do not know if our virtual desktop implementations would have been a success without it. The bigger benefit is that this streamlines any migration in the future and users can sign on to a fat PC as easy as signing onto a virtual desktop or presentation server....it does not matter, the profile is instantly pulled through.
Not trying to diss anyone but since when is Hardware consided a virtualization Utility?
I don't think VirtualIron or NetApps need or should to be in this list. Or does marketing dollars count here now?
What about Veeam, VKernel and a multitude of others?
Desktop Profile Portability
Whether using VDI, XenDesktop, or even Citrix Presentation server, our users had been left with issues centered around their Windows Profiles. These new technologies have the side effect of taking the personalization out of Windows. This not only creates issues for worker productivity but also creates an administration and support nightmare.
We overcame the problem with Entrigue's Script Start ProfileUnity.
I think you should add this as an essential virtual must have, especially on the desktop side.
The solution enabled us to make all of our virtual desktops stateless so at logon every Windows session is personalized for the user within seconds. Drives are mapped, users' personalized settings (including Outlook signatures, wallpaper, spellchecker, etc.) is pulled through. The solution is granular by design which allows for logons to be really quick.
I honestly do not know if our virtual desktop implementations would have been a success without it. The bigger benefit is that this streamlines any migration in the future and users can sign on to a fat PC as easy as signing onto a virtual desktop or presentation server....it does not matter, the profile is instantly pulled through.
top 10 Virtualization Utilities
Not trying to diss anyone but since when is Hardware consided a virtualization Utility?
I don't think VirtualIron or NetApps need or should to be in this list. Or does marketing dollars count here now?
What about Veeam, VKernel and a multitude of others?
NetApp's value is software
It'd be to your advantage to learn that NetApp's value is in it's software. Do be fooled that NetApp is on the list just because of hardware.
Regards
Virtual Iron
Virtual Iron is enterprise-class-virtualization software
It has nothing to do with hardware except that it runs on it
it is simple to deploy, to use and has a very intersting licensing and price model
regards,
volker
Post new comment