Skip Links

Network World

Dennis Hartmann

Call Routing Part 9: Tail End Hop Off (TEHO)

By Dennis Hartmann on Wed, 08/20/08 - 2:31pm.
Newsletter Signup

In the last blog, we explored an inter-site call routing scenario where 5-digit dialing was used over the IP WAN between Cisco Unified Communications Manager clusters (trunks) and 11-digit dialing was used to route inter-site calls over the PSTN.

Since inter-site call routing over the IP WAN circuit between New York and San Jose was so successful, the company has decided to route long distance PSTN calls from New York to the local San Jose area code 408 through the IP WAN circuit. Call routing in New York is currently setup so that all 11-digit long distance numbers match the 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX Route Pattern. We will add a new Route Pattern for all calls destined to 9.1408[2-9]XXXXXX. The new Route Pattern will be pointed to a Route List called SJC_TEHO_RL (San Jose Tail End Hop Off Route List). The SJC_TEHO_RL will have two Route Groups. The first priority Route Group will be the WAN_RG used in the last blog. After the Route Group is added to the Route List, the Route List Details for the WAN Route Group will be modified. The Calling Party’s External Phone Number Mask should be set to On so the Caller ID (ANI) sent on the PSTN is the 10-digit phone number of the calling party. The Called Party Transformations section will have a Digit Discard rule of PreDot to strip out the 9. If 9 1-408-555-1212 is dialed, the DNIS string of 1-408-555-1212 will be routed over the trunk to the San Jose cluster. Prefix Digits of 9 will be prefixed on this route Group so the call that is routed to San Jose is 9 1 408 555 1212. This will ensure that the 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX Route Pattern in San Jose is matched.

The last paragraph assumes that San Jose must route 11-digit phone calls for local 408 area code dialing. If the San Jose PSTN provider required local 10-digit dialing to route calls to the PSTN, a Called Party Transformation Mask of XXXXXXXXXX (10 X’s) would be required to convert the 11-digit pattern to a 10-digit pattern. The final result would be 9 408 5551212 forwarded from the NYC cluster to the San Jose cluster.

Let’s examine a scenario where San Jose, California’s PSTN provider required 7-digit local calling. The Called Party Transformation Mask in this scenario would be configured as XXXXXXX (7 X’s). This would ensure that we drop the long distance code (1) and the area code (408) from the dialed digits.

Alternatively, the San Jose cluster could have translation patterns configured to match on patterns and convert those patterns. The next blog will continue the call routing conversation and discuss translation patterns.

Tags

Call Routing in SRST

0

This questions might not be related to the current TEHO scenario but still related to call routing.

In SRST; IF HQ Phones needs to call BR1 Phones by dialing BR1 Extensions. How would this be achieved?

Since WAN link will be down and BR1's router Registered as MGCP GW with CUCM will not be accessible from HQ.

SRST HQ to Branch Call Routing

0

Users at the HQ will not be able to dial the Branch site using the company's abbreviated dial plan. If the branch site has DID lines, the users at the HQ would have to dial the PSTN dialable DID lines.

A workaround in CUCM would be to configure a generic translation pattern that matches the number of digits in your dialplan. When the phones are unregistered, the translation pattern (1XXXX for a five digit dial plan beginning with a 1) would take over. The translation pattern would have a Called Party Transformation Mask of 1XXXX with a prefix of 9140855 (assuming as 9 as an access code and a DID range of 1-408-551-XXXX).

TEHO Terms of Services and Regulations

0

I have been very interested in Toll Bypass/TEHO. I work for a Corporation that has over 2,600 locations throughout the nation and about 300 locations in other countries. We could save a lot of money on Long Distance at least in the states but I can't seem to find any solid information on if TEHO is even legal. I know that the easiest way to find this out is to just ask AT&T or Verizon, but they want our business so that they can sell us their VoIP solutions and I wouldn't really trust their answer.

If Cisco is teaching the TEHO method then does that mean its legal???

TEHO Terms of Services and Regulations

0

I have been very interested in Toll Bypass/TEHO. I work for a Corporation that has over 2,600 locations throughout the nation and about 300 locations in other countries. We could save a lot of money on Long Distance at least in the states but I can't seem to find any solid information on if TEHO is even legal. I know that the easiest way to find this out is to just ask AT&T or Verizon, but they want our business so that they can sell us their VoIP solutions and I wouldn't really trust their answer.

If Cisco is teaching the TEHO method then does that mean its legal???

TEHO Legal Issues

0

TEHO is legal in the United States. You will need to check with the local provider in each country to determine legal issues surrounding TEHO. I'm not aware of a site that has this documented.
-Dennis

TEHO calling ID pass through

0

I'm very interested in implementing this for my 70 sites, but find the calling ID mask doesn't get passed. It seems the tail-end's PRI restricts the mask to just the block of DID's assigned to it. All other masks cause the calling ID to change to the PRI's billing number.
Do you know if it's possible to have this changed from the telco?

TEHO CLID

0

It depends on the telco and a lot of legal "stuff".

The provider should allow you to pass any CLID that you own at any of your sites. I have heard of providers that will allow you to pass any CLID you own, as long as you sign a legal document that you will only pass numbers that you own. Good luck.

TEHO

0

I am very much interested in TEHO, and have around 85 sites in 55 countries, 2000 users.

What happens when the WAN is down, or there is no enough bandwidth, will the calls go through PSTN?

I have to do a bit of experimenting in the lab

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <strong> <i> <br /> <br> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Welcome, visitor. Register Log in
Advertisement:
About Cisco Unified Communications

Dennis Hartmann, CCIE No. 15651, is a Unified Communications consultant and author of Implementing Cisco Unified Communications Manager, Part 1. Dennis is also a lead instructor at Global Knowledge. Dennis was first exposed to CallManager during the CallManager 2.0 time frame when Cisco acquired Selsius. Dennis has various certifications, including the Cisco CCVP, CCSI, CCNP, CCIP, and the Microsoft MCSE. Dennis has worked for various Fortune 500 companies, including AT&T, Sprint, Merrill Lynch, KPMG, and Cabletron Systems. He lives with his wife and children in Hopewell Junction, New York.

Check out the Cisco course catalog from Global Knowledge.