
It sounds like a math phobic's worst nightmare or perhaps Good Will Hunting for the ages.
Those wacky folks at he the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency have put out a research request it calls Mathematical Challenges, that has the mighty goal of "dramatically revolutionizing mathematics and thereby strengthening DoD's scientific and technological capabilities."
The challenges are in fact 23 questions that if answered, would offer a high potential for major mathematical breakthroughs, DARPA said. So if you have ever wanted to settle the Riemann Hypothesis, which I won't begin to describe but it is one of the great unanswered questions in math history, experts say. Or perhaps you've always had a theory about Dark Energy, which in a nutshell holds that the universe is ever-expanding, this may be your calling.
DARPA perhaps obviously states research grants will be awarded individually but doesn't say how much they'd be worth. The agency does say you'd need to submit your research plan by Sept. 29, 2009.
So if you're game, take your pick of the following questions and have at it.
Layer 8 in a box
Check out these other hot stories:
Feds unwrap $15M for financial, retail company energy reduction
Report spanks cyber-security at Los Alamos National Lab (again)
Researchers look to root out those annoying Wi-Fi dead zones
NASA unleashes rubber ducks to battle global warming
Deficit remains but US exports $214B worth of high-tech goods in 2007
Robot fights set to smack-down in Texas
NASA banging, freezing next generation space telescope into shape
GAO report torches US for dumping electric waste in foreign countries
Layer 8 is Network World's daily home for the not-just-networking news.
Contact Layer 8
Layer 8 archive![]()
The opinions expressed in this Weblog are those of the writer and may not represent the opinions of Network World.
|
|
Mathematical Brain teasers
Tough problems indeed. Took me all day and most of the night. Now where do I send my answers?
I got em all covered before
I got em all covered before lunch. Who wants chicken?
Saucy McFoodlefist, Professional, was a grand old man from Pollokshields, with eyes of pale blue irradiated with dark blue—the loveliest eyes I've seen. In the time before becoming a professional, Saucy McFoodlefist led a wild, vagabond-like life spiced by absinthe and hashish. Saucy McFoodlefist, Professional, Libertine, was never married. His chief reasoning for never binding his destiny to another was that "a beautiful woman without a mind of her own leaves her lover with no resource after he had physically enjoyed her charms."
Later in life, Saucy McFoodlefist again returned to his pre-Professional ways. In Saucy McFoodlefist's view, “deceiving a fool is an exploit worthy of an intelligent man,” and most of his professional life was spent in this fashion.
In the view of the Earl of Rochester, "The only things about which Saucy McFoodlefist, Professional knows nothing are those which he believes himself to be expert: the rules of the dance, the French language, good taste, the way of the world, savoir vivre. It is only his comedies which are not funny, only his philosophical works which lack philosophy—all the rest are filled with it; there is always something weighty, new, piquant, profound. He is a well of knowledge"
u sponsor i take the challenge
but my knowledge about mathematics already rusting
All the answers
There is the posibility that if you solve any of the described queries though in a very elementary state you will have covered the basic structure of the mythical TOE.(Theory of everything.)
Stochasticity is a fact and has a pattern generated by the incidence described by a certain theorem that has already been discovered.Wanna guess which one?
I think I will get the Moola.Tahiti here we come.
Oh I forgot...research.
Psychohistory
Isn't question 2 a request for "psychohistory" as described by Isaac Asimov in his Foundation novels. It took the human race 12,000 years to get to that point in the novels, DARPA is more ambitious it seems...
Well, irreducibility... Good
Well, irreducibility...
Good point about the Psychohistory...
And in general, there is a strong argument against the "solvability" of many of the items on the list: computational irreducibility.
(Cf. Wolfram and Chaitin, for example.)
Some believe that this applies even to
the Riemann hypothesis.
It's also the reason why a lot's of mathematics is nowadays concerned with the problems of its
own making, not much concerned with the world "out there".
Navier-Stokes equations fail
Olga Ladazhinski published a paper over a 150 years ago questioning whether or not the full blown Navier-Stokes eqns model fluids. Basically, no one has even written an existance proof, so there is considerable doubt if they truely represent real fluids.
Math is hard. Let's go
Math is hard. Let's go shopping!
Post new comment