Network World
Saturday, November 22, 2008
DNSstuff.com
Get information about your IP
IP Information
50+ On-demand DNS and network tools

Guest Blog: Google Blogoscoped

Google Subnet

Navigation

An Investigation Into Communication Between NSA and Google

A PDF file published at GovernmentAttic.org contains, according to its description, the “NSA [US National Security Agency] administrative processing file for FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] request for records on Google and contracts With Google”. I asked Seth Finkelstein of the Infothought blog about this set of documents. He only glanced it over but here’s what he’s making of it:

<<I don’t see any *particularly* deep meaning or implications in the file. It seems pretty dull. It’s a “Freedom Of Information Act” case file. The Freedom Of Information Act is a US law that allows people to request certain information from the US government. Journalists and activists typically make those requests. Sometimes those requests uncover interesting things, but sometimes they just yield boring bureaucratic documents.

Here’s what it’s about:

1) Journalist asks the NSA for ALL material about their connections with Google, under the Freedom Of Information Act.

2) NSA responds to journalist that it can tell the journalist that the NSA has bought some search appliances and a support contract from Google, and can send the journalist the contract documentation about buying those items.

This, frankly, strikes me as pretty dull.

3) Google (as a party affected by the request for documents) objects that the price for the search appliances and hourly consulting rate for the service contract and other details are proprietary business information and shouldn’t be made public.

See around page 22

4) Lots of discussion between the NSA document office and Google as to what specific items are public or private.

See around page 65

5) NSA sends journalist the contract, with redactions per #4 – for around two million dollars, NSA bought four Google search appliances, two-years replacement warranty on all of them, and 100 hours of consulting support.

See page 74 and on.

Ho-hum.

Maybe the deeper meaning and implication was that the only thing the NSA was willing to tell the journalist was that it had
bought a few Google search appliances, and claimed everything else was classified and not to be released under the Freedom Of Information Act law.>>

[Thanks Anonymous!]

[By Philipp Lenssen | Origin: An Investigation Into Communication Between N ... | Comments]

[Advertisement] Want to advertise here? Your ad will show in the blog and feed.

Reprinted with permission from Google Blogoscoped.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <i> <b> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <br /> <br> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

About Google Blogoscoped

Philipp Lenssen from Germany, author of Google Apps Hacks, shares his views and news on the search industry in the daily Google Blogoscoped. Items here are reprinted with his permission.

The opinions expressed in this Weblog are those of the writer and may not represent the opinions of Network World.

Advertisement: