Skip Links

Network World

Richard Stiennon

A letter to President Obama

By stiennon on Mon, 11/03/08 - 8:49am.
Newsletter Signup

Dear President Obama:          By the time you read this you will be the president-elect of the United States of America.  I am writing to alert you to the serious action that is required to secure the information systems of the country that you will soon lead.  To say that the US government computing infrastructure, in all of its various branches, departments, and offices, is vulnerable is an understatement.   While the GAO and OMB have been doing what they can to push security they are facing staunch resistance to change.

Anyone in the private sector who has tried to implement change in security practices has encountered the resistance that is now in evidence within your government.  Only through executive dictate can real change happen. 

Here are my ten suggestions for immediate action to secure the United States against the threat of espionage, random attacks, terrorist attacks against cyber infrastructure, and all-out cyber warfare. 

1.       Immediately issue a Presidential order that establishes responsibility for cyber security with real negative repercussions for those who fail to prevent breaches.  For civilians this means being fired; for the military this means court marshal, demotion, and expulsion for serious security breaches. Do not allow the blame to be foisted off on contractors. The only way that security gets implemented is if someone's job is on the line.  This goes all the way to the top, of course. Whoever you appoint to replace the current Assistant Secretary for Cyber Security and Communications must understand that security breaches imply failure and those responsible will be replaced.

2.       While National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has been responsible for security standards and has created some great documents it is a stretch to try to make the entire government comply with them during  your term as President.   Those responsible for locking down government networks and defending data will need to be empowered with a set of strict rules.  These rules should include:

  I.            All access must be explicitly authorized. 

  II.           All users must be identified and strongly authenticated.

  III.          All applications must be reviewed for security vulnerabilities.

  IV.          All network attached systems must be scanned for vulnerabilities on a schedule.

   V.          All network connections must be firewalled.

   VI.         All firewalls must be configured to "deny all except that which is explicitly allowed".

  VII.         All government networks must be mapped and understood.

 VIII.         All data needs to be encrypted at rest

 IX.            All communication links need to be encrypted

   X.           All intrusions need to be aggressively analyzed and appropriate responses executed.

3.       Empower OMB to withhold funding to any agency that does not comply in a timely (less than 6 months) manner with 1. and 2.

4.       Decentralize security management.  One person cannot be effective in overseeing a cyber security policy. Security is everyone's responsibility and the system should motivate responsible individuals to take action.

5.       Fix the DHS information sharing capability by learning from the recent advance of social networking that helped fund your campaign.  Getting members of law enforcement to collaborate effectively is not a task that can be accomplished by rolling out a quick fix technology.  In a secure environment individuals could find the most effective way s to communicate and share critical information.

6.       Do not confuse security awareness campaigns with actual security improvements. The time, effort, and money that is spent on publicity campaigns could be better allocated to securing government networks.

7.       Do not propose a new massive spending effort or any new departments to oversee cyber security.  Security should be part of every computing infrastructure purchase and everyone's job.

8.       Immediately make transparent the secret Cyber Security Center started by your predecessor.  The disclosed $30 billion is twice the size of the global security industry today.  Security by obscurity is impossible. Our enemies know what we are doing. Congress, the press, and the people must know just what steps are being taken to protect this country's critical infrastructure. 

9.       Stop spying on citizens of the United States.  While discovering terrorist plots is a legitimate function of the FBI, the violation of the privacy and individual rights of the people is too high a price to pay for the dubious information gleaned by snooping on email.

10.   Stop efforts to develop weapons-grade viruses and cyber attack systems.  Our military and secret agencies have not demonstrated that they have the integrity, controls, or expertise to play with technologies that could ultimately bring the Internet down and cause more damage to our economy, communications, and critical infrastructure than any enemy could.

Mr. President, too long has the United States government struggled with the safe deployment of new technologies.  Billions have been spent to computerize and network every department of the Military, Congress, and the Executive branch. Yet the security vulnerabilities and the threat to the stability of our government, markets, and country have become too great.   Steps must be taken.  These steps.

here, here

0

Richard - from your mouth to gods ears! Or in this case Obama's big ears. But with so much on the plate I worry about the priority this will be given.

alan

It will get priority

0

when there is a MAJOR incident Alan.  Not before.    Such is the way of security. Reaction and action.

 

-RS

when did networkworld become

0

when did networkworld become a democrate ?

Sermon of Idealistic Promises

0

Obama was a STEALTH candidate with NOTHING to show for his short 2 yr State Senate position; he essentially voted "Present" since he did not want to take any stand as he paved his way to a Presidential run.

His speeches or rather SERMONS are filled with the same Idealistic Hopes a Baptist Priest would give each Sunday.

Your OPEN LETTER is just WISHFUL thinking.

The ONLY reason why Obama won was due to a PROTEST VOTE by the majority of Voters who make up most of the American Center and Right Conservatives.

Historically throughout the world a PROTEST VOTE has ALWAYS produced a very NEGATIVE OUTCOME; this is how STALIN came to power and starved/killed 24,000,000 people.

Big Bubba, Sit down and have

0

Big Bubba,

Sit down and have a sandwich, listen to the sermons that the man speaks.... You too will learn something.

@stiennon Good Morning!

0

Good Morning!

Seriously, @beaker.

0

Get a life!

666 - The mark of the consultant?

0

We need a more positive, personalized identificaiton.

Mark on the forehead, or on the right hand:

http://www.saintbook.org/biblia/Revelation.html#30924

Gonna happen. Why fight it?

(lol)

Don't agree on all

0

So
1. This pushes all blame down to the bottom, where the poor sysadmin saddled with 3 peoples jobs to do gets made the scapegoat.

2. Some good here. Many already implemented by OMB/NIST etc. However, VIII. - get real, why would, for example, my lab need to encrypt many TB of scientific data that have no PII? Blanket policy orders like this would be impossible to carry out, and therefore would be ignored, while targeted policy would could be enforced.

3. Yeah, except who at OMB has a clue to be making these decisions?

4. Efforts are consistently headed toward centralization, and unfunded one-size-fits-all policy, which is sapping budgets at the bottom end.
And that's the real security issue - all this supposed money for IT security that stays in DC and evaporates. Down here at the bottom, any budget increase will get denied even as the mandatory policies continue to come in.

You lost all credibility when...

0

... you wrote, "Security is everyone's responsibility ...." The old adage true - when everybody is responsible, nobody is responsible. When there is a breach with "everybody" resposible for security who do you fire or court marshal - everyone?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <strong> <i> <br /> <br> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Welcome, visitor. Register Log in
Advertisement:
About Stiennon onSecurity

Richard Stiennon is a security industry analyst. He is currently consulting, speaking and writing on all manner of security topics for IT-Harvest, the IT research firm he founded to cover the security space. He was most recently chief marketing officer for Fortinet. He has served stints at PricewaterhouseCoopers, Gartner, and Webroot Software.