I've been meaning to write about this Slashdot poll, but other work kept getting in the way. As you'll see from the survey results, however, not everyone can claim that excuse ... at least not with a straight face:
The poll asks a single question: "How many hours do you REALLY work each day?" (The emphasis, added by Slashdot, is critical here.)
Counting the 10 percent who do not work at all (unemployed, part-timers, retirees, the independently wealthy and cannily slothful, I presume) a full 40 percent report really toiling fewer than four hours per day.
As you're digesting that nugget, know that more than 27,000 Slashdot readers participated in this survey; so, while I have always been dismissive of online polls, this one offers a substantial number of respondents drawn from a pool that overlaps considerably with Network World's readership.
OK, so how many of you want to cop to working four hours or less? (C'mon, I won't tell.)
Another 24% pegged their real work hours at a not-all-that-much-more-imposing four to six. Sixteen percent claimed the standard seven to eight, while another 11 percent went two hours better.
And the self-described workaholics? Three percent punched the clocked at 11 to 12 hours per day and another 3 percent rounded out the survey at more than 12.
A problem with the survey -- I mean in addition to its unscientific methods and the unmasking of massive workplace laziness -- is that respondents had a difficult time agreeing on exactly what was being asked. However, the resultant discussion was both enlightening and amusing. I've read through all 252 comments -- hey, it's my job -- so that you won't have to.
There were those whose answers would depend on who's doing the counting.
"A huge part of my workday is reading technical material. I do that from home and usually have browser tabs open to Slashdot, various support forums, and usually a mainstream news page. I often work in the same clothes I slept in. So how many hours a day am I really working? 10 or more if you ask me. My fiancé will give quite a different number."
There were many of the "depends on your definition" variety.
"I define 'work' as anything that needs to be done, but I don't like doing. .... I don't like beer, and I've never smoked pot, so I guess anything other than sex is work for me. Although I love fixing computers, so even though I get paid for it, I don't really consider it work."
Depends on your definition, II.
"Really, the question about the question is: Do you mean 'How many hours a day are you allocating to your job,' vs. 'How many hours are you doing useful work for your employer?" Job is easily 9-10 a day. Useful work is capped around 5. Overhead chews (from expense reports to travel arranging, to yet another bozo who couldn't be bothered coming to the meeting needing to be filled in) up the rest."
Depends on your definition, III.
"I've worked 2 kinds of jobs, proactive and reactive. The reactive kind is stuff like help desk or sysadmin. Your presence is required for 8 hours (or more!), but during that time, you don't have constant work. You work when an issue flares up (which is why it's often compared to being a firefighter). Some dweebs look at you 'not working' and think 'what a waste' or 'if you're bored, I have something for you to do,' but in the end, those are distractions, since those jobs require one to be instantly available.
"In a proactive job, the work is fairly continuous. My engineering jobs of late have been like this. When I run out of stuff to do automating the security needs of a large government 3-letter agency, I move into server upgrading/modernization, or building a cluster solution, figuring redundancy and fault tolerance into the overall design. In my architecture work, there are always opportunities to innovate new solutions and designs."
There were those who see employers keeping score.
"Usually 9-10 per day. If anyone isn't pulling an equal amount of the load around here, they have a bull's eye on them for the next round of layoffs. In fact, at this point, anyone working less than nine is pretty much a guaranteed casualty."
And not everyone sees a choice in the matter.
"I'm an EE working in hardware development at a tech company in the upper Midwest. Our workload and schedules are insane, yet the company is in the midst of still more layoffs. My to-do list continually grows. At the moment, it's well over 100 non-trivial items and tasks. Each single item is roughly four to 40 hours of concentrated work and at least a half-dozen of them are supposedly my top priority depending on who I ask at any given time. I arrive at 7 a.m. and leave at 6 p.m. I take an hour lunch at most, and at best I get to spend maybe 15 minutes across the entire day checking news sites, including Slashdot. I'm salaried, and thus not eligible for any OT. I know many other hw engineers in the same boat."
There was the obligatory "Office Space" reference.
"Yeah, but if you could go ahead and come in on Sunday too that would be great, yeah."
And a lot of veering off on tangents.
That said, a careful study of my past shows that 40% of my "sick" days have been taken on either Monday or Friday.
OK, I know what you're asking now: How many hours a day do I really work?
Somewhere between enough and too many.
(Tuesday update: Among the Slashdot comments was one titled, "Retired, but working more than ever." It's extremely sad and not directly related to the Slashdot poll, but I thought it was worth sharing, so you can find it in this separate post.)
Welcome regulars and passersby. Here are a few more recent Buzzblog items. And, if you'd like to receive Buzzblog via e-mail newsletter, here's where to sign up.
2009's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries.
A few clean words from the creator of Cursebird.
Want to close your LendingTree account? Sorry, no can do.
Wikileaks releases 6,780 quasi-secret Congressional reports
Girl's 22,795 text messages in a month nothing to celebrate
Twitter limits searches on its site ... Why?
more than I want...
Having participated in several productivity studies I can say that if you really look at it, 4 good hours is probably pretty close.
But since I have this bad habit of getting into trouble when I have nothing to do, my boss keeps pretty close tabs on me to make sure I stay busy. I do try to sneak in a little fluff time, (like now) and avoid doing anything really productive while I drink my afternoon coffee.
So while my productive day may include more than 4 productive hours, it is not by choice.
Really...?
You are writing on a poll taken from slashdot? That's probably as credible as taking a poll from 4chan. What a garbage article.
more than I want too
My employer is too cheap to pay for training (or even buy books) and between replacing 10 year old equipment that is failing and learning all of the new "fantasy" technology/software that the CEO friends tell them about at expensive seminars & lunches I find myself learning too fast for it to be enjoyable (or remembered the next day once the problem's solved).
This is true. So True. I
This is true. So True.
I would like to add to this. There is also the countless meetings you have for some exceptional problem that our normal processes can't account for. Managers want a matrix of the options with weighted evaluations of each category.
And in the end, its always the same. Choose the option that costs no money. Don't screw it up, because even though its a hack and its not what you recommend as our trusted and fairly payed engineer... we as managers can not take on any risk or cost. We need bigger bonuses. Jump through the flaming hoop, monkey!
Less than I'd like
As a freelancer, most of my work time is non-paid...i.e. finding clients, ironing out contracts, keeping up with industry news, etc. In terms of paid work hours per day, about three I'd say.
4 hours min
you have to keep your brain working at least 4 or 5 hours a day, at your job otherwise, you will "dumb down"
on another tangent!
"That said, a careful study of my past shows that 40% of my "sick" days have been taken on either Monday or Friday."
Well, considering Monday and Friday constitute 40% of the work-week I'm not very surprised!
WHOOSH
WHOOSH
mouthful of air....
i am a software developer at a global information systems company. i do a lot of data structure and dynamic database stuff... i think i actually only work 3-4 hours a day, but i need the down time because it is really difficult to concentrate for 8 hours straight. sometimes if i am doing something interesting i can stay focused for 10 hours straight... those instances are few and far between.most of work is work which means you are forcing yourself to concentrate which can't be maintained for very long. if you don't work in at a job where you have to do difficult mental tasks (ie. differential equations, matrix transformations, etc) yo uwill never understand why programmers need this down time. just my 2 cents.
That said, a careful study of my past shows that 40% of my "sick
"That said, a careful study of my past shows that 40% of my 'sick' days have been taken on either Monday or Friday."
Yes, which leaves 60% for Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday... or on average, 20% for each day.
Post new comment