If collaboration solutions were a smart investment in 2008, they are even smarter in the recession of 2009. Well architected SharePoint solutions are likely to be one of the smartest investments companies can make to survive and thrive in this challenging economy. Here are a few ideas to help justify or accelerate your SharePoint solution investment and ensure that your investment shows a quick and sustainable return.
Why SharePoint now?
- Solutions that automate business processes, especially those processes that are designed to replace lost workers, can help organizations deliver value with fewer resources. If an organization already owns SharePoint (and we all know that many do), building an automation solution on the SharePoint platform may be easier to justify than an expensive investment in business process automation software.
- Effective collaboration solutions help to minimize travel expenses. Pretty much every organization I know is severely cutting back on travel expenses this year. In a geographically dispersed organization, cutting back on travel doesn’t mean project teams aren’t expected to work together; it must means that they have to work more effectively at a distance. SharePoint team sites, wikis, and blogs are a key enabler for effective distance collaboration.
- Now, more than ever, companies can’t afford the productivity drain resulting from not being able to find information. I’ve read some estimates that the infamous “knowledge worker” spends close to 50% of his time searching for information. Can organizations really afford not to invest in a solution that helps increase information transparency and improves “findability?” Should we really be paying our scarce resources to navigate through endless LAN folders or should we be investing in solutions that promote asset re-use and facilitate knowledge transfer?
When you get the commitment to move ahead, here are some implementation considerations that are even more important in a recession than they are in a growing economy:
- Don’t just throw SharePoint “over the fence” and expect users to jump on board. Create sample solutions and model sites so that teams can quickly begin to take advantage of the improved ability to find information in a well-architected SharePoint solution.
- Don’t skip the information architecture step – it’s just as easy to design an “unfindable” SharePoint solution as it is to create a nested folder hierarchy that is 14 layers deep. A small investment in information architecture (from an expert consultant either inside or outside the organization) can help ensure the success of your SharePoint investment.
- Be sure to include a governance plan to ensure things don’t get out of control and that users have a plan to maintain content over time. The only way your strategic collaboration investments will have a chance of being a valuable investment to ride out the recession and provide a platform for growth in a turn-around is if the content is reliable and current (in addition to being “findable”). A strong governance plan is critical to ensure that your investment delivers value in both the short and long term.
Selling SharePoint
Just did a couple copy/paste for my Monday meeting. Thanks Sue :-)
Would you have some references for your stats on the "infamous knowledge worker"?
Knowledge Worker Stats
IDC conducted a study (2007 I think) which stated we all spend 9.6hrs per week finding stuff before we can start the task in hand, that's 10 weeks a year. Plenty of latent potential to go at!
References
The article I was reading that inspired this post was in the current issue of Infonomics. but the printed version of the article was actually different from what I've linked to online - wierd. There there is a very over-used statistic from an IDC white paper in 2001 that I often see referenced in many articles (and sales pitches) called "The High Cost of Not Finding Information." The first version of this white paper was produced in 2001. I doubt that the entire paper is still available online, but there is a 2006 article in KM World that has the percentage up to 35% (not the 50% in the recent Infonomics print issue but a big number nonetheless). This article sums up several studies (with links to the companies that did them) that measured similar things.
Re: references
Excellent, thanks!
For those without Sharepoint
Alfresco is an interesting opensource alternative.
Alfresco has done a lot to integrate with
team sites, wikis, and blogs (and publishing to these in a controlled way). As you say these tools are a key enabler for effective distance collaboration.
Your three secondary points ( dont "toss over fence and forget", do architect it, and monitor / governance) also apply to Alfresco - or any similar solution for that matter.
I don't think that it is
I don't think that it is good idea invest money now
_____________
phentermine diet
Nice view from an organisational rather than technical side
Thanks Susan for describing the SharePoint world from an economical side. In times where budgets are cut everywhere this is helpful argumentation with clients. I took the liberty to use some of your arguments for my German blog.
Great Article
Hi Susan,
Great article, I have a number of clients running SharePoint and it is one of the best products I have seen from Microsoft in years, and is growing in popularity rapidly.
SharePoint is easy to work on from a development side and easy for the end user to add items, view items and search for anything. Highly recommend SharePoint to any business as a data consolidation tool.
Excellent Article
Susan,
Great article, We have seen a greater amount of interest in SharePoint 2007 and a number of large business looking to invest in collaboration technologies in general. We would certainly underline the importance of information architecture for anyone looking at this solution.
Hi Susan, Great article!
Hi Susan,
Great article! Just what I was looking for.
Post new comment