Looking to help eliminate the dangerous and inefficient hodgepodge of communication and network technology used by emergency response personnel, the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) today said it had picked 14 groups from across the country to pilot an ambitious Multi-Band Radio project.
In 2008, the DHS Science and Technology Directorate awarded a $6.2 million contract to Thales Communications to demonstrate the first-ever portable radio prototype that lets emergency responders-police, firefighters, emergency medical personnel and others-communicate with partner agencies, regardless of the radio band they operate on. This is the final pilot in a three-part test, DHS said.
Currently radios only operate within a specific frequency band; subsequently, responders are often unable to communicate with other agencies and support units that operate in different radio frequencies. Comparable in size and weight to existing portable radios with similar features, multi-band radio would provide users with much-improved incident communications capabilities, the DHS stated.
Thales Liberty multiband mobile radio received US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) certification in April. The Liberty radio is made in the U.S. and is the first multiband, software-defined LMR designed specifically for government agencies and first responders, the company said.
The MBR prototype is capable of operating in the primary public safety bands between 136-174 megahertz (MHz) and 380-520 MHz as well as in the 700 MHz and 800 MHz bands. Additionally, when authorized, the MBR is capable of operating on the Department of Defense bands in the 136-138 MHz and 380- 400 MHz ranges as well two Federal Government bands: 162-174 MHz and 406.1-420 MHz. This capability will for the first time let for Federal agencies interoperate with local, tribal, regional, and state counterparts, the DHS said. Carrying a price tag of $4,000-$6,000, the MBR is equal in form, factor, and cost to existing high-end portable radios, the DHS said.
The 14 pilot organizations are:
-2010 Olympic Security Committee (Blaine, Wash., and Vancouver, B.C. Canada)
-Amtrak (Northeast Corridor)
-Boise Fire Department (Boise, Idaho)
-Canadian Interoperability Technology Interest Group (Ottawa, ON Canada)
-Customs and Border Patrol (Detroit)
-Federal Emergency Management Agency (Multiple Locations)
-Hawaii State Civil Defense (Honolulu)
-Interagency Communication Interoperability System (Los Angeles County, Calif.)
-Michigan Emergency Medical Services (Lower Peninsula Areas)
-Murray State University (Southwest Kentucky)
-Phoenix Police Department and Arizona Department of Emergency --Management Greater Phoenix and Yuma County)
-Texas National Guard (Austin, Texas)
-U.S. Marshals Service (Northeast Region)
-Washington Metro Area Transit Authority Transit Police (District of Columbia)
Each agency will conduct a minimum 30-day pilot in fall 2009.
Layer 8 in a box
Check out these other hot stories:
FTC opens all out assault on economic cyber-scammers
DARPA wants a super-efficient supercomputer that can fit into one cabinet, thanks
How NASA connects with its latest moon orbiters
Scareware peddlers will only fork over $116,000 of $1.9M settlement
Seeing without revealing: IBM touts encryption breakthrough
Lasers keep quantum bits from dying before their time
What's your weather? Americans see 300 billion forecasts each year
Satellite glitch rekindles GPS concerns
Can commercial space technology get off the ground?
Feds bust $55 million international telephony hacking ring
Saving Unix one kernel at a time
The Borg lives: BBN gets $30M for artificial intelligence wizard
Court says government background security checks go too far
Anyone remember the ARRL?
ARRL = American Radio Relay League. It is an organization of ham radio operators that's been around since the 1930s or 40s, one of whose missions is (pretty sure they're still active) to provide emergency communication where all other means break down. Would have been good to have them recognized and included since they have already a robust network and both the old and new parts of a combined network would likely be better than the sum of the parts.
http://shipcom.com/SNP/Smart%
http://shipcom.com/SNP/Smart%20Network%20Platform%20Brochure-3.pdf
And your point is?
The whole purpose of getting these multi-band, multi-format radios is that infrastructure to manage cross band 'patches' is unnecessary. Someone can roll up and operate on the existing system.
BTW, there's been a call for Part 90 multi-band radios for almost 10 years, ever since the demise of the Yaesu FTH2070 VHF/UHF portable. Shame they're so late with product.
ARRL's been around a lot
ARRL's been around a lot longer than that. It was founded in 1914. See http://arrl.org
Amateur Radio as a First Responder
It is ashamed that an Amateur Radio organization that already provides emergency communications was not enlisted. Some members of the Amateur Radio Club that I am in work with the local county to do such work in an official manner. The radios appear to cover at least two amateur bands (144-148 MHz and 420-450 MHz). The only obstacle for amateurs would be the cost of the units.
Ham Radio.... what happened?
I agree, Ham Radio is the First Responder unit. As far as 'EMPs' or whatever, everone I know stores spare radios' in ammo-boxes (faraday cages) to protect them.
When the poo hits the fan, Hams will be the ones coordinating.
Not invented here to save the day! Ham vs. This System
Eschewing my tin foil hat as much as possible...
One of the obstacles to the use of amateur radio in this context may well be the regulations against the use of these bands for monetary gain. It would possibly be a gray area to have public service personnel required to license.
In the event of an emergency, RACES and ARES would be activated, but there is a possibility that this would take enough time to blunt the response.
Further, some of the groups in the pilot program do not seem to fall into stipuation under which hams can operate on any frequency they can get their hands on: that the emergency directly relates to the safety of human life or property. Perhaps the emergencies they are envisioning fall outside of that scope?
That being said, I would take the tin foil off and posit that the DHS does not seem to be a trusting bunch. The groups they are coordinating here are less so, and its human nature for organized "professional" groups to resent the presence of what is perceived as a "weekend warrior" to do the job. From a purely bureaucratic standpoint, hams are an unknown quantity - no background checks to get your license, and ARES membership is purely voluntary.
Ultimately what is saddening here is that there's a lack of promotion of what HAMs do, and policy restrictions that DHS is addressing with technology rather than addressing the root concerns.
Ham radio not first responders
Ham Radio may provide support, but they are NOT first responders. Makes sense that they were not included.
Definitions matter
Your definition of "first responders" could be called into question. I would think those who respond to an emergency first are those who first report it--the public citizens calling 911 for example. Notice this does not include any of the government agencies.
Some of these public citizens are, indeed, licensed amateur radio operators who have the necessary technical skill levels to assist with communication within a chaotic and atypical emergency. This may be on their radio, on their telephone (if lines are not already jammed), or on their computers relaying messages for the government agencies. They assist in communication with the other professionals who have other skill sets.
This communication assistance by the amateur radio operators is often when other government agencies simply can not communicate using their non-technical skill levels.
Granted, for the benefit of actual communication, it is important that ALL (government and citizens) respondents involved understand and follow defined procedures. Therefore, procedures should be DEFINED for amateur radio operators and allow them to be included in these decisions.
A moment for Pride, not jealousy
HAM radio has already been a huge part of this project. One of the key tenants and reasons for the Amateur service's continued existence is to 'advance the state of the art' (2008 ARRL Handbook, Ch. 1). The Software Defined Radio was developed in large part by the amateur community over the last decade and more. Now that this technology is becoming mature, it is natural that other commercial or public service entities will make use of it. This is not something to be ashamed of or jealous over, it is what we as HAMs are here to do.
In the early part of the 20th century, it was HAMs that first developed and used Phase Modulation (PM) and Frequency Modulation (FM) as viable means of transmitting high-fidelity audio. Likewise, it was HAMs that developed and expanded technologies relating to high-speed and reliable data transmission over RF. All of these technologies have long since been observed, utilized and improved upon by the larger lay and commercial community.
Amateurs will always be there to improve ,expand and develop new communication technologies. Likewise, we will also always be there to provide an independent auxiliary to normal communications platforms in the event of emergencies. The fact that we have done our jobs so well over the last century that our methods are regularly co-opted by the communications industry is a point we should be proud of, not something to sulk over.
Post new comment