If there was any doubt Microsoft and Google were out to eat each other's lunch, both companies have proved they're going after the other's core business; desktop OS+apps and search, respectively. Microsoft upped the ante big time with Bing. Google's responding right on the heels of the Google Wave announcement with Google Chrome OS. The timing of both Google announcements are clearly intended to throw Microsoft customers a curveball right before the Window 7 release, but I'm not sure it will have much of an impact in the short run. Longer term, well, that could be a different story.
Chrome OS is taking a much different path than traditional OSs like Windows. Google Chrome OS is essentially a Google optimzed Linux kernel with a thin desktop UI layer (we'll see why it will be thin in a moment) that relies on the Google Chrome browser as the app UI layer. Let's take apart Google's blog post announcement bit by bit to see what Google's planning to do. FYI - This info is only hours old, so I reserve the right to change my mind with a little more time to digest and analyze the announcement. :)
For application developers, the web is the platform. All web-based applications will automatically work and new applications can be written using your favorite web technologies.
To me this implies everything will be a web app; there won't be installed apps (besides the browser). Now I do have to wonder what "favorite web technologies" means. Flash, Ajax and JavaScript? Or is Google being more coy here and hinting that apps might be all Google Wave based, with backwards compatibility (JavaScript, etc.) for non-Wave based apps?
People want to get to their email instantly, without wasting time waiting for their computers to boot and browsers to start up.
Gmail, plus other Google apps of course. Fast boot because a thin Linux OS just needs to get up and going enough to launch the Chrome browser.
They want their computers to always run as fast as when they first bought them.
No apps or other software need be (or allowed?) installed locally in the OS. Everything is a web app so there's no apps or utilities being installed that will slow down the OS.
They want their data to be accessible to them wherever they are and not have to worry about losing their computer or forgetting to back up files.
Web apps' data are persisted at the hosted site so there's no need for local storage for applications. Thus, little need to back up your Google Chrome OS Netbook (or PC down the road), especially if the device comes with a recovery partition you can use to reset things if something serious goes wrong.
Even more importantly, they don't want to spend hours configuring their computers to work with every new piece of hardware, or have to worry about constant software updates.
Again, if everything's a web app then there's no local software to worry about configuring and updating.
The software architecture is simple — Google Chrome running within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel.
In summary, it sounds like Google Chrome browser, running in a really thin desktop UI layer, with Linux as the OS. If everything is a web app and data storage is in Google web apps (in the cloud), you don't need much more than a browser.
Bottom line, Google's essentially announcing an OS for web user appliances. It fits really well with what a Netbook is supposed to do; email and browsing. That's a much different OS than Windows 7, and Google intends it be that way.
I see this as a big audacious bet by Google from two standpoints. Apps will almost always be web apps (the way we think of web apps today), and in situations where an installed app would be better, Google Wave will fill the need.
You might ask what I mean by that second point, "in situations where an installed app would be better" -- isn't everything becoming a web app? Isn't Microsoft moving their Office products into the cloud (i.e. they're becoming web apps)? SaaS is all the rage, etc. etc. Not too long ago I would have said yes, everything's becoming web-ized (becoming a web app), but I've changed my mind about that for several reasons... largely thanks to Apple.
If everything was going the way of web apps, we wouldn't see the mass quantities of iPhone apps being developed and consumed by iPhone users. The iPhone has the first really usable mobile web browser, but even Safari doesn't obviate the need for other apps. We also wouldn't see small, narrow desktop client apps for things like Twitter, IM clients, music players, yada-yada -- we'd see users going to the web for all these uses, but they don't always. We still want client apps for some things because, frankly, a web experience doesn't cut it, especially on mobile devices. If all Twitter had was the web site's interface, I'd probably use it 1/10th as much as I do using a client like TweekDeck. I don't read the WSJ via Safari on my iPhone, but I do read it using the iPhone WSJ app. Again, web apps aren't always the right fit, a client app is sometimes better. (I have a lot of other reasons why I believe this but that will have to be for another blog post.)
Now I will hedge my bet here by saying that the wildcard in all this is Google Wave. Wave has the potential to drastically change web apps from having the web page feel they do today, to having the behavior of the client apps I talked about.
If Google can pull this off, it will definitely be a game changer and in the long run could spell trouble for Microsoft Windows. The other thing Google has going for them is they are following in the footsteps of Apple's Mac OS X by using Linux as the real operating system under the hood of Google Chrome OS. Apple's shown that can be a very successful strategy.
The Google vs. Microsoft game is getting as interesting as last weekend's Federer vs. Roddick tennis match.
Like this? Here are some of Mitchell's recent posts.
- What Danger Lay Waiting In Shortened URLs
- Ray Ozzie's Inspiring Talk Is Just As Applicable To You
- Context-Aware Applications - The Future Is Ready To Happening
- Windows 7 Beta: The 5 Most Important Things Microsoft Did Right
- Firefox Stays In The Game With Firefox 3.5
- Microsoft's Big Bet On The Cloud and Search
- Can Free Microsoft Security Essentials AV Software Fight Off Entrenched Interests?
Great Beginning and Intermediate Books Mitchell Recommends:
- Beginning SharePoint 2007
- Beginning SharePoint 2007 Administration: Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 and Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007
- Beginning Ruby: From Novice to Professional, Second Edition
- Beginning C# 3.0: An Introduction to Object Oriented Programming
- Programming .NET 3.5
Also visit Mitchell's other blogs and podcasts:
Visit Microsoft Subnet for more news, blogs, opinion from around the Web. Sign up for the bi-weekly Microsoft newsletter. (Click on News/Microsoft News Alert.)
The Leader in Network Knowledge
The only way to compete with Rich Client Apps
Good summary Mitchell--much better than the Financial Times.
I am not surprised by Google's move, as it is really the only way they can continue championing web apps and also compete with rich client applications.
A good example of this is drag-n-drop functionality. Today, you can drag-n-drop objects within a browser window, but you cannot drag files or pictures from your disk into a browser application. Google had to write a plug-in to enable this in the Google Wave demos.
They apparently have put in a proposal for HTML5 to enable this; however, it has not been accepted yet.
Creating a thin OS will make it possible to create much more robust web applications. I think it has been a competitive detriment for Microsoft to make this too easy, as it would decrease the value of building rich applications on the Windows OS.
Microsoft's strategy has shifted under the label of "Software + Services", which means they want to push rich apps that are Windows OS dependent, but talk to services in the network.
Bottom line, I think this is great news for all users. After all, competition drives innovation.
A nice toy
Web is for fun and toys.
Try to do serious work in a Web Cloud:
* Image creation with Photoshop and a tablet?
* Render a huge video with something like Vegas or Premier?
* MIDI capture/score creation ala Finale or MuseScore?
* Store your 12 Mpxl Digital SLR raw TIFFs in the cloud? lol
The kids will play in Chrome, the adults who actually make the toys they kids use will still run computers with real OSs like freeBSD, linux, and yes, Windoze.
Post new comment