HP and 3Com are claiming that their switches offer a better value that Cisco equipment, due largely to lower price for comparable performance. But does that equate to overall value in every instance?
We took a look at the HP and 3Com claims this week and lined up what we determined were comparable switches to Cisco's. In most instances, the lower price claim held true -- but there is more to value than upfront capital cost alone.
Read our coverage and determine for yourself: does saving 20% on the acquisition cost necessarily equate to overall value over the life of the switch and/or network?
More from Cisco Subnet:
- Are HP, 3Com a better value than Cisco?
- Management vision of Cisco CEO John Chambers under fire
- New features can open up Cisco IOS to hackers
- It's Really Only Partly Cloudy Out There
- One Cool ISO: Fully Automated Nagios
- Video rental records more private than cloud data
Win great stuff from Cisco Subnet
Like e-mail? Subscribe to the Cisco Alert newsletter. Like RSS readers? Subscribe to the Cisco Subnet RSS feed
Follow Cisco Subnet on Twitter.
The Cisco Subnet blog is written by Network World managing editor Jim Duffy Visit the Cisco Subnet home page daily and while you are there, subscribe to the Cisco Alert e-mail newsletter, which includes news and views generated by the Cisco Subnet community as well as Cisco-related stories on Network World and elsewhere on the Web.
Follow Jim Duffy on Twitter