I always find it amusing when desperate Wall Street investment bankers float takeover rumors in the hope of putting lackluster performing companies into play while also simultaneously inflating the laggard company's stock price.
My case in point? Alcatel-Lucent!
Alcatel-Lucent vs. Cisco Stock Chart
According to a recent Reuters story:
Alcatel-Lucent takeover on radar as sector shrinks
"Buying Alcatel-Lucent, with its higher cost base and broad portfolio, would only drag down Ericsson's profitability, Nomura Securities technology specialist Richard Windsor said. Cisco Systems, which has a massive war chest of cash, could also be interested to secure a better foothold in mobile and IP technology. To date, Cisco's strategy has been targeted, smaller acquisitions to add promising technologies to its portfolio. Its appetite for a larger, more complicated deal is unknown. A Cisco spokeswoman declined to comment on its acquisition strategy. An Alcatel-Lucent spokesman declined to say whether it would put itself up for sale or had hired bankers to advise it."
Personally, I've got to admit that I find Alcatel-Lucent's most recent Form 6-K filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission of keen interest:
Alcatel-Lucent Financials
(a) Translation of amounts from euros (“€”) into U.S. Dollars (“$”) has been made merely for the convenience of the reader at the Noon Buying Rate of €1 = $ 1.4020 on June 30, 2009.
(1) Classification of share-based payments between cost of sales, administrative and selling expenses and research and development costs is provided in note 5.
It's my opinion that if John Chambers directed Cisco to buy Alcatel-Lucent, then disgraced Silicon Alley Insider blogger Henry Blodget (who in 2003 was charged with civil securities fraud and then barred from the securities industry for life), might find partial redemption with his summer blog story headline:
Has Cisco's John Chambers Lost His Mind?
What's your take, can you see John Chambers directing Cisco to buy Alcatel-Lucent?
![]()
BradReese.Com Cisco Refurbished - Services that protect, maintain and optimize Cisco hardware
Contact: Brad Reese | Twitter: http://twitter.com/BradReese
Brad Reese cofounded BradReese.Com Cisco Refurbished, which enables affordable Cisco networks globally by assuring customer satisfaction with guaranteed one year warranties on both Cisco Repair as well as Refurbished Cisco.
Don't be shy, contact Brad Reese online or call him Toll Free:
866-864-0506
International callers may wish to call Brad by dialing:
850-364-4115
No, but I can see him buying MOTO
You know?
Why, to upset CSCO and MOT's duopoly of cable in the U.S.?
Why, to upset CSCO and MOT's duopoly of cable in the U.S.?
Am sure DOJ would object.
Besides, CSCO is challenged just running CSCO.
Sincerely,
Brad Reese on Cisco
Network World Cisco Subnet
BradReese.Com Cisco Refurbished
Not gonna happen.
As always, good post Brad.
A CSCO buyout of ALU will NEVER happen. At least not anytime in the near future. There are a bazillion reasons as to why, I don't even know where to start (ALU's M-CAP, subsidiary companies like Genesys, CSCO never buys competitors, etc).
Even - if - CSCO was crazy enough to make a bid for ALU, they'd be putting $$$ in to a sinking ship. There's no prospect for a turn around at ALU, especially when both ALU and CSCO lost out to Ericsson on exclusive 4G/LTE contracts to US' biggest service providers: Verizon and AT&T (AT&T is CSCO's biggest customer).
Then again, Cisco's once venerable M&A machine (under the legendary M&A top dog Barry Eaggers and Mike Volpi) is just not what it used to be. In the last few years under the guidance of vacuous clowns like Dan S. and Ned Hooper, theu have done acquisitions that didn't provide any significant ROI and acquisitions that have BOMBED!!! (a la the recent Pure Digital/Flip acquisition which is being dubbed as the "Flop" simply because the iPhone and other smartphones will crush the Flip).
I don't think NSN, Ericsson or anyone else will even bid for ALU.
The rumour that I am hearing is that HPQ's Corporate Development guys were looking at ALU. Take it for what its worth.
Best,
Flattery will get you everywhere, just ask John Chambers
Hi Renegade,
Flattery will get you everywhere, just ask John Chambers, heck, Cisco's entire corporate culture is totally dedicated to the adulation and flattery of John Chambers.
It's my personal opinion that Cisco's M&A prowess is kaput simply because no acquisition candidate's management will knowingly join Cisco's committees, councils, boards and working groups, except for the express purpose of cashing out.
I bet Cisco is even having a tough time attracting/recruiting competent executives and now has to settle for hiring the bottom of the barrel dregs, Padmasree Warrior, type of corporate executive, all because of Cisco's management committees, councils, boards and working groups.
Cisco's corporate culture is dedicated to the adulation and flattery of John Chambers and of course it's making Cisco stockholders scandalously rich:
Flash Player 9 or higher is required to view the chart
Click here to download Flash Player now
Sincerely,
Brad Reese on Cisco
Network World Cisco Subnet
BradReese.Com Cisco Refurbished
What a joke, ALU is just the
What a joke, ALU is just the worst company to buy in this world. But we never know CEO's can sometimes take stupid decision. As an example mr EB from 3Com he just sunk the company in just few years...
And what is the reason
Why you think that ALU is the worth company to buy in the world ?
I concur wholeheartedly
I concur wholeheartedly.
CSCO really needs to up their game or they will end up being like the next Nortel, Alcatel-Lucent, etc. And that is a very realistic possibility, as we move towards convergence between the telcos, cablecos, utility companies (ie. smart-grid, etc). CSCO is being attacked on all fronts from switching equipment (Vyetta) to WAN (Riverbed) to even their shameful performance in the Consumer arena (Apple).
CSCO should just quit with all BS areas that they don't have a standing in and focus on their core vertical -- enterprise telecom. And build on that, making that its first and foremost priority.
Everyone "in the know" full wells knows that the future of enterprise telecom is in Managed Services, SDP, SOA, etc. as we move towards a 4G/LTE (for wireless), IP and Cloud Application Services based environment. Yet in these areas CSCO is a virtual no-show and an unknown.
IMO, Ericsson -- already the global leader in Managed Services -- has set-up shop in CSCO's home turf (the US), and has taken on the "who's who" of the telcos as their customers by way of successful wins (a la AT&T,m Verizon, Sprint-Nextel, T-Mobile, etc.), just might be the behemoth that might put the final nail on CSCO's coffin, at least from an enterprise/services standpoint.
And Ericsson's recent $1.3B acquisition of Nortel's wireless unit, coupled with their new head of M&A, clearly signals that they're out to win, either by way of R&D, new accounts and/or M&A. And so far, they're on a winning path.
Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics
Click on the link to extend the stock chart from six months to a year - or better, 2 years. A very different picture! ALU is only accelerating because of the recent takeover speculation. Now it's Huawei touted as the suitor.
Lies?
Lies?
You accurately state:
I assumed readers would understand that's a "central point" of this blog story.
So please explain exactly how the "stock chart" is a lie.
Thanks,
Brad Reese on Cisco
Network World Cisco Subnet
BradReese.Com Cisco Refurbished
Post new comment