Skip Links

Network World

Michael Cooney

NASA says 200-yard long asteroid will miss Earth

NASA had said Apophis asteroid could have hit around 2029

By Layer 8 on Wed, 10/07/09 - 2:23pm.

Asteroid 253 MathildeNASA scientists have recalculated the path of a large asteroid known as Apophis and now say it has only a very slim chance of banging into Earth. 

The Apophis asteroid is approximately the size of two-and-a-half football fields and updated computational techniques and newly available data indicate the probability of an Earth encounter on April 13, 2036, for Apophis has dropped from one-in-45,000 to about four-in-a million, NASA stated.  

Layer 8 Extra: 10 NASA space technologies that may never see the cosmos

15 genius algorithms that aren't boring 

Initially, Apophis was thought to have a 2.7% chance of impacting Earth in 2029. Additional observations of the asteroid ruled out any possibility of an impact in 2029.  

The new data were documented by near-Earth object scientists Steve Chesley and Paul Chodas at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. They will present their updated findings at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society's Division for Planetary Sciences in Puerto Rico this week.

 

The recalculated trajectory  came from scientists at the University of Hawaii's Institute for Astronomy in Manoa and its 88-inch telescope, located near the summit of Mauna Kea. 

The information provided a more accurate glimpse of Apophis' orbit well into the latter part of this century. Among the findings is another close encounter by the asteroid with Earth in 2068 with chance of impact currently at approximately three-in-a-million. As with earlier orbital estimates where Earth impacts in 2029 and 2036 could not initially be ruled out due to the need for additional data, it is expected that the 2068 encounter will diminish in probability as more information about Apophis is acquired, NASA said.

 NASA detects and tracks asteroids and comets passing close to Earth through its Near Earth-Object Observations Program or "Spaceguard." The program has been in the news lately as a National Academy of Sciences report said that while the space agency is tasked with watching out for huge chunks of space rocks that could smash into the earth, it has been denied the money to actually do the job.

 The problem is that while Congress mandated four years ago that NASA detect and track 90% of space rocks known as near earth objects (NEO) 140 kilometer in diameter or larger, it has not authorized any funds to build additional observatories, either in space or on the ground, to help NASA achieve its goals, according to a wide-ranging interim report on the topic released by the National Academy of Sciences this week.   

 The report notes that NASA has managed to accomplish some of the killer asteroids mandate with existing telescopes but with over 6,000 known objects and countless others the task is relentless.  NASA does carry out the "Spaceguard Survey" to find NEOs greater than 1 kilometer in diameter, and this program is currently budgeted at $4.1 million per year for FY 2006 through FY 2012. 

The  report notes that United States is the only country that currently has an operating survey/detection program for discovering near-Earth objects; Canada and Germany are both building spacecraft that may contribute to the discovery of near-Earth objects. However, neither mission will detect fainter or smaller objects than ground-based telescopes. 

The report goes on to state: Imminent impacts (such as those with very short warning times of hours or weeks) may require an improvement in current discovery capabilities. Existing surveys are not designed for this purpose; they are designed to discover more-distant NEOs and to provide years of advance notice for possible impacts. In the past, objects with short warning times have been discovered serendipitously as part of surveys having different objectives. Search strategies for discovering imminent impacts need to be considered, and current surveys may need to be changed.

Layer 8 in a box

Check out these other cool stories:

Harvard's robotic bees generate high-tech buzz

Massive magnet pulls 100,000X more than Earth's magnetic field

FBI says trio of terrorism e-mails are scams

US Homeland Security looking to hire 1,000 cybersecurity professionals

FBI warns of social networking fraud, malware escalation

Star Trek communicator lives!

NASA wants your ambitious high-tech contest ideas

NASA's manned space strategy gets harsh review from watchdogs

1,000 year-old math problem solved

Futuristic security surveillance system brings Big Brother to life

Seven future car technologies your tax dollars are paying for

Your picture shows a relative width in kilometers???

0

You might want to fix that.

How big is this thing?

0

Your article says 200 yards long. The picture and accompanying scale indicates more like 60 KM. A little conversion indicated these two are not the same.

n00bs

0

You mean to tell me that you two geniuses wasted the time posting your garbage complaints, when the asteroid in the picture is very clearly asteroid 253, aka Mathilde? It took a complete amateur like me to point that out to you? It's a picture of an asteroid that just happens to be included in an article about an asteroid. Nowhere in the article did it state that the picture was the asteroid in question, nor was the picture labeled as such. It took you to make that assumption. Take the time and energy you used to generate your complaint and use it to engage your brain next time, so that you can figure it out for yourself, rather than have me there to point it out to you again. To the author: GREAT ARTICLE! It was plainly obvious to me that asteroid 253 Mathilde (52 kilometers/33 miles in diameter) was not Apophis, which is only 200 yards across, as you clearly stated.

noobs?

0

>>> is very clearly asteroid 253, aka Mathilde?

so you moused over the image and read the tag? Genius you obviously are.

LOL

0

OMG...Anon and EricTheGreat just got owned! LOLOL! Maybe next time they'll find something to actually contribute, or, like my dad used to say, just keep your mouth shut!

Steroid

0

I hope it is true :O
-------------
phentermine blog

Engrisch much?

0

Very obvious reading comprehension problem you have there. I clearly stated that I was an amateur, not a genius. Rather than learn your lesson, you attempt to obfuscate your ignorance by attacking me. You sir are of truly wealthy intellect.

map size

0

so then am I to believe that a football field is thirty kilometers long?

map size

0

Only in Europe! ;)

What Percent

0

Isn't 4 in a million the same as 1 in 250,000?
For what ever reason the odds just don't seem the same!!!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <strong> <i> <br /> <br> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Welcome, visitor. Register Log in
About Layer 8
Layer 8 is written by Michael Cooney, an online news editor with Network World