Microsoft and Red Hat have made good on their February promise to validate that their server operating systems will function properly on one another's hypervisors. Most reporters and pundits aptly note that this just made good business sense and in no way means the two frienemies will fall into each other's arms like best buds, like, for instance Microsoft and Novell.
One might think that Novell is and should be miffed about this. Didn't Microsoft promise its undying love to Novell in exchange for a bundle of Microsoft's cash, vouchers for Novell SUSE and a promise to not be sued over those nebulous Linux patent infringement matters and a bunch of joint development projects (like Moonlight, which brings the nobody-really-wants-it-Silverlight to Linux machines)? Didn't it have to endure the Linux and open source communities foaming at the mouth over such selling out? Thankfully for the enterprise, Microsoft isn't really a one-Linux-at-a-time kind of company, especially when it comes to allowing those Red Hat versions of Linux to run on a Windows Server 2008 hypervisor.
Specifically, the companies today announced that they have validated that Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008 R2 will operate, and be supported on, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 using the Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) hypervisor. They also announced that they have validated Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4 to run on and be supported on, Hyper-V.
As noted, the two announced that they were joining each others virtualization certification programs back in February. So why did it take them until October before they gave the support ok to let each other's servers run on each others hypervisors? They were waiting for both companies to finish with their latest-greatest technologies ... Windows Server 2008 R2 (which will be released October 22 along with Windows 7) and Red Hat's new virtualization platform, based on the KVM hypervisor which Red Hat gained when it purchased KVM's maker Qumranet for $107 million about a year ago.
Red Hat users have also been waiting for the management tools for the KVM hypervisor. The product in question is RHEV Manager (RHEV-M), (here's a video that details RHEV Manager). It is currently being tested by customers, reports CNet's Gordon Haff.
Want to note, too, in all the coverage, the best line was had by The Register, who described today's news as,
"Microsoft and Red Hat have now consummated vows to love and cherish
each other's operating systems on their corresponding hypervisors."
It sounds like the story line of a soap opera. Cue in announcer: Meanwhile, just a couple of days ago, Red Hat stepped up a formal challenge to get rid of Microsoft's Linux-patent-infringement claims once and for all -- and to do away with all the ridiculous litigation that stems from software patent-infringement claims altogether. Red Hat ask the Supreme Court to completely nix software patents. Reports InformationWeek Government:
"Red Hat has filed a friend of the court brief with the U.S. Supreme Court asking it to uphold a lower court's ruling that software isn't patentable. Red Hat is not a direct party but took a position against software patents in the case of Bernard Bilski and Rand Warsaw versus David Kappos, Undersecretary of Commerce and director of the U.S. Patent Office. The case is now before the Supreme Court. Rob Tiller, an assistant general counsel at Red Hat, filed the brief in what he said was a rare chance to attack the patent issue head-on."
Let's note that Red Hat isn't an innocent bystander when it comes to patents. The company earned or applied for 49 itself so far in 2009, according to Patents.com.
I'm the one that wrote "Software patent reform needed to stop legal bullying" so yes, I'm rooting that Red Hat's plea to the Supreme Court works, though I'm also not hopeful. Software patent reform is one of those endless debates, like health care, in which so much money is at stake, that no movement toward sanity seems possible.
In the meantime, the company that wanted to sue its competitors out of business (Microsoft) and the company that taught the world how to make a ton of money out of free software, (Red Hat) find their best interests are linked to one another.
The technical details on the validations that have been completed can be found here.
Like this post? Check out these others.
- Microsoft, researchers release new operating system project: Barrelfish
- Virtual Computer solves the XP to W7 upgrade problem
- The iland Workforce Cloud: Go ahead keep your head and desktop in the cloud
- Avaya Buys Nortel. What's that mean for Microsoft?
- Use FILESTREAM Data in 2008 but watch out...
- Keys to Creating Successful Global Teams
- Why you need vendors to adopt OVF before you move to the cloud
- Virtualization Day: Virtual Machine Manager R2 RTM and Windows 7 XP Mode
Plus, visit the Microsoft Subnet web site for more news, blogs, podcasts. Subscribe to all Microsoft Subnet bloggers. Sign up for the bi-weekly Microsoft newsletter. (Click on News/Microsoft News Alert.)
Follow All Microsoft Subnet bloggers on Twitter
Follow Julie Bort on Twitter
Julie Bort is the editor of Microsoft Subnet and Network World's Online Community Editor. She also writes the Open Source Subnet blog and is the editor responsible for the Cisco Subnet and Open Source Subnet web sites. If you have an idea for a blog, or a news tip on Microsoft, Cisco or Open Source technologies, contact her at email@example.com, 970-482-6454 or follow Julie on Twitter @Julie188.
The Microsoft Subnet blog is the official blog of the Network World's Microsoft Subnet community. Microsoft Subnet is the independent voice of Microsoft customers and is your gateway to daily Microsoft news, blogs, opinion, books, prize giveaways and more. Visit the Microsoft Subnet index page daily, and while you are there, subscribe to the Microsoft newsletter.
Policy on comments: Respectful discussion is welcomed! However comments that use inappropriate language, consist of name calling or personal attacks, or include accusations of wrongdoing are not appropriate. Those comments will be deleted or edited