Here's Richard Marcello of Unisys extolling one of what he sees as the virtues of cloud computing yesterday at the Cloud Computing Conference and Expo in Santa Clara:
"We were able to eliminate a whole bunch of actually U.S.-based jobs and kind of replace them with two folks out of India."
Those actually U.S.-based jobs presumably were held by actual Americans trying to feed actual U.S.-based families.
And what does "kind of" mean?
(2010's 25 Geekiest 25th Anniversaries)
Marcello's title is president of technology, consulting and integration solutions, not director of public relations, but you might expect that by now industry executives would be better at finessing such a volatile topic. Advancements in technology have been eliminating (and creating) jobs since the invention of the wheel, of course, but the pace of such disruption these days combined with years of recession and an overall dismal U.S. job market call for a certain degree of tact if not empathy.
Instead, Marcello decided to offer a lecture when interviewed after his keynote by InfoWorld's Paul Krill: "If people don't embrace cloud computing," he intoned, "I don't think the companies will be around in 5 to 10 years. I think you have to take that broader, holistic view."
It's worth noting that Marcello's company, Unisys, is a major cloud-computing vendor, a platinum sponsor of the Cloud Computing Conference, and, that it made a news announcement at the event, headlined this way in a press release: "Unisys Brings Advantages of Cloud Computing to Clients' Internal Data Centers with New Secure Private Cloud Solution." From that release:
Recent Unisys research has consistently shown that security concerns are the leading cause of enterprise and individual users' hesitancy in adopting cloud computing. The most recent findings of the Unisys Security Index, a bi-annual global study of consumer opinion on security-related issues, showed that a significant percentage of respondents worldwide were uncomfortable about having their personal data controlled by a third party without assurance that the data could be kept secure.
In other words, these decisions aren't always as simple as handing the keys over to two folks out of India.
Welcome regulars and passersby. Here are a few more recent Buzzblog items. And, if you'd like to receive Buzzblog via e-mail newsletter, here's where to sign up.
This year's 25 Geekiest 25th Aniverseries
Hey, guys, they're kicking our butts at Trivial Pursuit.
A pre-Halloween treat: Roto-Rooter's 'The Raving' turns 30
Geek finds missile launcher ... finding its owner not so easy.
MIT ditches 500-word "long" essay? Does that "T" stand for Tweet?
Half of iPhone users would drop AT&T like a bad habit.
"Anonymous Digging?" What could go wrong?
Replace?
I hope this guy isn't expecting a round of applause from those that lost their jobs. I'm sure those that profited are stoked. There are those in the world that will work for food. The U.S. is rapidly filling up with them.
It's hard to make a profit
It's hard to make a profit when no one has a job to buy your products/services. I can never grasp why stock brokers get excited about layoffs and pump up the stock price.
Sadly it is because the
Sadly it is because the company has suddenly reduced it's operating costs
outsource him
I think his job could be outsourced to a couple of guys in India too.
I don't think it would even
I don't think it would even take one offshore guy to do HIS job.
"kind of" means the two guys
"kind of" means the two guys in India have the phone numbers of the Americans left who can tell them how to do their jobs. Eventually the Indians come up to speed, start their own companies which put the hollowed-out American companies out of business. But vermin like Marcello don't care because they're stuffing their own pockets with cash in the meantime.
Anon, you got it write.
Anon, you got it write. CEOs like this one really do not care how they destroy the company as long as they stuff their pockets with cash. They will be sunning on the beach when the company goes belly up.
Wage Differential Tariffs
Wage Differential Tariffs are the only viable solution to the parasitic outsourcing of jobs. Free trade isn't free - we're paying for it with our future. Before Reagan, and his Ayn Rand cultist handlers, schemed their way into control of our government, we had protective tariffs to protect the US economy.
Personally, I don't have any desire to turn the United States into the pinnacle of civilization that India is.
What is really needed is new
What is really needed is new political party/union. A political party that represents the working American and small business men against the Globalist Corporate & politician. Forget the consecrate talk show host who, though they deny it, work for the Globalist
... Horrible
That man should be hung by his toes, beaten senseless, and be left for the vultures. The company he owned should then be disassembled, and re-built around American values. I shudder when I think of the future people like that have guaranteed the I.T. industry will see. I'm in a niche, small business support, but I doubt it'll be long before the market is so flooded with garage-techs that I won't be able to keep up.
Post new comment