Skip Links

Network World

Michael Cooney

FCC and DOT team-up, want high-tech cure for distracted driving

iPods, Blackberry, Smartphones, video games and GPS systems all under the gun for distracting too many drivers

By Layer 8 on Wed, 11/04/09 - 11:28am.

The Federal Communications Commission and the US Department of Transportation are teaming up to develop what they called high-tech solutions to the growing problem of distracted or inattentive drivers

The DOT and FCC said they will set up a working group to evaluate technology-based answers to the distracted driving problem and will improve outreach efforts to educate the public about the dangers of texting while driving, talking on cell phones while driving, and other distracting behavior that can lead to deadly accidents, the agencies stated. 

Layer 8 Extra: Seven advanced car technologies the government wants now 

The DOT recently showed research findings by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) that show nearly 6,000 people died in 2008 in crashes involving a distracted or inattentive driver, and more than half a million were injured.  On any given day in 2008, more than 800,000 vehicles were driven by someone using a hand-held cell phone. 

"Across the board, federal researchers who have directly observed drivers of all ages found that more and more people are using a variety of hand-held devices while driving - not just cell phones, but also iPods, video games, Blackberrys and GPS systems.  In particular, cell phone use for talking and texting is now more prevalent on our nation's roads, rail systems and waterways, carrying a dangerous potential for accidents," the NHTSA stated.   

Cell phones and texting are now the primary means of communication for many people, especially young adults.  NHTSA's research shows that the worst offenders are the youngest drivers: men and women under 20 years of age, the NHTSA stated.

 "We now know that the worst offenders are the youngest, least experienced drivers," said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood in a speech recently.   "Unfortunately though, the problem doesn't end there.  Distracted driving occurs across all age groups and all modes of transportation, from cars to buses and trucks to trains. We must work together to find solutions that will prevent crashes caused by driver distraction."

 In a recent speech, LaHood noted a number of actions the DOT is undertaking in the areas it can most change quickly: Make permanent restrictions on the use of cell phones and other electronic devices in rail operations; Ban text messaging altogether, and restrict the use of cell phones by truck and interstate bus operators; Disqualify school bus drivers convicted of texting while driving, from maintaining their commercial driver's licenses. 

He also called on state and local governments to work with to reduce fatalities and crashes by making distracted driving part of their state highway plans, and by passing state and local laws against distracted driving in all types of vehicles-especially school buses.

 On a technology level what can these agencies do? The House recently approved the Advanced Vehicle Technology Act of 2009 with a goal of developing a wide range of scientific advances for cars including technology that could help with the problem if it can get out of the labs fast enough. 

For example, an onboard computer system to monitor driving characteristics such as unsafe driving behavior. According to a DOT report, feedback from such a system can be supplied to drivers in real-time or in the case of a commercial driver, provide carrier management a view into its driver's behavior. Such a system would monitor speed; following behavior; attention/inattention; fatigue symptoms; and general safety. 

Crash avoidance technologies could mitigate negative effects of drivers using cell phones or other distracting devices but drivers using a portable touch-screen phone and examining a dashboard screen image at the same time could be further distracted, the Government Accountability Office noted in a report last year.  Such systems could also create complacency that could exacerbate dangers. Representatives of the automobile industry have said that consumer training in the use of new technologies could be key to maximizing safety benefits, the GAO stated. 

Layer 8 in a box

Check out these other cool stories:

12 mad science projects that could shake the world

How to build a cyborg astrobiologist

NASA: 2 rocket companies win $1.65M moon lander prize

X Prize gets $5.5M of economic stimulus money for 100MPG car

High-tech camera, algorithms fuse for better sleep apnea test

FTC delays identity theft protection rules till June 2010

NASA: A crazy month of changes, challenges

NASA begins to outline future with revamped advisory council

DARPA "balloon hunt" could win you $40K cash

FBI: Ex- CEO of YouSendIt charged in denial of service of attack

Typewriter puts identity thieves in Federal prison

Ultra-endurance spy plane closer to reality

Feds whiffing on millions in electronics waste disposal

 

 

 

  

Non technical solution

0

Make speed breakers and/or don't keep roads in good shape..any discomfort will result in less carelessness..

Better driver training would

0

Better driver training would help. as would requiring recertification every 5 years coupled with compulsory training.

Are you KIDDING ME!

0

How about making sure people you license are qualified to drive first. Some of the tests in states like Florida are would be laughable if it did not end up killing so many people.

$10 - a drive around a small block, you make your blinkies, 3 point and no parallel parking, no english necessary - OK you pass.

Take a look at Germany and France. You are required to actually have training and hours in different car typesbefore you get your license and they make it costly to fail or have it revoked. THAT reduced problems.

We do it for airplanes, trucks and other machinery... why not cars. Mind Boggling to see the government yet again completely miss the source of the issue.

In regards texting and talking while driving. Wouldn't the answer be LESS technology?

Technology is the answer

0

A very simple fix to prevent cellphone use and texting during driving would be to implement a GPS-based solution where it would prevent use if the user is traveling faster than a couple mph. If you're moving you can't use your phone. Using the GPS method could also allow the ability to differentiate between roadway and railway travel so a rail passenger could still use their phone. I'm also sure an inter-lock could be developed so that passengers could use their phones but not the driver.

http://www.utahpersonalinjury

0

http://www.utahpersonalinjurylawfirmblog.com/2009/01/new_device_can_block_cell_phon.html

Those should be standard on all new car models. As for the old cars, simply implement a law against cell phone usage while driving. There's nothing more embarrassing than getting pulled over and handed a $100 ticket for texting your boyfriend. Of coarse, having older drivers re-take the test every 10 years or so wouldn't hurt either.

Mass Transit?

0

Maybe if most people use mass transit, then you can a) place policy that require the drivers to pay attention on the road, and b) be much easier to replace when eventually we are comfortable with a computer driving for us?

How about...

0

...not depriving those of us who CAN talk on our cell phones or text while driving without getting into accidents of the right to use the phones and service we're paying for? Or is that too much to ask for in this nanny-state we're becoming since Obama's ascent to the White House?

Why should those of us who can do 2 things at a time be punished because there are those who are incapable of working within their limitations out there? The government should keep its nose out of such things.

(BTW, I drive in DC and use my phone all the time without a headset. I have yet to get a ticket, and have no intention of paying it if I ever do.)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <strong> <i> <br /> <br> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote>

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Welcome, visitor. Register Log in
About Layer 8
Layer 8 is written by Michael Cooney, an online news editor with Network World