At Spokeo.com, an online data broker website, anyone can probe into your life well beyond name, age, address, e-mail address, home and cell phone numbers. Ok, when it comes to protecting privacy that's scary enough. But now Spokeo has been accused of selling inaccurate information and violating consumer protection laws. The Center for Democracy and Technology filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission.
Indeed, I did a search on an entirely fake person based on a fake e-mail address and Spokeo was ready to offer up loads of information for me, none of which could possibly have been real.
CDT proclaims that Spokeo promotes the use of its services in making employment decisions by providing financial data and credit ratings, but fails to disclose its data sources or to allow consumers any opportunity to dispute and correct false information. For paid subscribers, these profiles include “Credit Estimate” and “Wealth Level” ratings as well as information about mortgage values, income, investments, lifestyles, ethnicity, religion, politics, education levels, judgments about shopping, recreational habits, Google maps of home and the amenities in a residence, as well as family relationships like the names of other adults living in a residence and the number and ages of children living there.
Spokeo advertises aggregating information from 43 social networking sites and other offline sources. In a recent interview with Fox News, Spokeo President and co-founder Harrison Tang said Spokeo grabs all the profiles, blogs, photos, videos. "Anything that you can see, basically we’ll grab it." Tang also told Fox that his site streamlines the process of finding information about prospective employees for potential employers and job recruiters.
In this name search example, I literally searched for the term “Fake Name” and voila! Spokeo has an address, wealth indicator and more available if I become a paid subscriber.


Although Spokeo has a disclaimer that the data provided "may not be used as a factor” in establishing a consumer’s eligibility for credit, insurance, or employment, it has also marketed itself as a service for conducting background checks to aid law enforcement agencies or HR recruiters. Spokeo profiles are divided into five sections: “Basic Profile,” “Wealth,” “Lifestyle and Interests,” “Household,” and “Neighborhood.” Spokeo offers free people searches, but to find in-depth information, a person must pay $2.95 - $4.95 depending upon the length of the Spokeo subscription.
CDT claims the search results are inaccurate and a consumer is not notified if the information disclosed resulted in an adverse determination based on that data. According to CDT's complaint filed with the FTC, "Spokeo’s business activities, including the provision of detailed consumer reports without the controls mandated by the Fair Credit Reporting Act, constitute violations of that Act, as well as unfair and deceptive practices in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act."
Searches can be conducted on Spokeo by name, email, phone or by importing friends from Yahoo, Hotmail, Gmail or AOL email address books. Unpaid users who search for an email address will see a confirmation that the email is valid as long as the domain associated with the email is a real domain. In the screenshot below, the email address is purely fictitious. In this example, I searched for information on a nonexistent person with a fake email address of spokeo_stalking_tool_u_sux@whitehouse.gov. Even though the email account does not actually exist, for the low, low price of $2.95 a year, Spokeo implies that it has extensive information about that email address.

Despite the glaring inaccuracies, Spokeo has published detailed consumer reports about millions of consumers. The complaint to the FTC maintains, "Consumers are only given an imperfect mechanism to delete their profiles, though most of those consumers would have no reason to know about or visit Spokeo to do so. Meanwhile, employers and other decision makers may be relying on Spokeo’s credit, wealth, and lifestyle data in making adverse determinations about consumers without their awareness."
Spokeo is practically the definition of privacy invasion, claiming to receive millions of hits a day, providing vague assessments about people in a mix of "scarily correct and wildly wrong info." From a privacy standpoint, Spokeo is a creepy tool. It hawks itself as having advantageous technology that collects "data from hundreds of online and offline sources, including but not limited to: phone directories, social networks, marketing surveys, mailing lists, government census, real estate listings, and business websites." Spokeo also claims its advanced algorithms aggregate “scattered data into coherent people profiles, giving you the most comprehensive intelligence about anyone you want to find.” Yet Tang has admitted in press interviews that Spokeo is often inaccurate.
With CDT filing a complaint with the FTC, spooky Spokeo may be headed for spanky city.
Ms. Smith (not her real name) is a freelance writer and programmer with a special and somewhat personal interest in IT privacy and security issues. Smith has a diverse background in information technology, programming, web development, IT consulting, and information security. She focuses on the unique challenges of maintaining privacy and security, both for individuals and enterprises. She has worked as a journalist and has also penned many technical papers and guides covering various technologies. Smith is herself a self-described privacy and security freak.
Smith is an independent contractor and is not affiliated with any vendor that makes or sells information technology.
Where was the CDT when the
Where was the CDT when the first phone directory came out in the 1870s? "How DARE they publish telegraphic voice module datum! What's next, a Morse code directory? A map of all the locations of post-chaises and stagecoaches? I am going to notify President Grant by telegram POST-HASTE!" Every generation has its fear-mongers.
way to miss the point
The article is not taking a position on data brokers. This story is about deceptive advertising (implying that they had information based on made-up addresses) and violations of the fair credit reporting act. I don't believe Bell was accused of deception (like telling you that they totally have a listing for someone who doesn't even own a phone) nor did they provide credit information without a mechanism to correct erroneous information in violation of the FCRA.
None of that, however, shows ho little you seem to understand about contemporary technologies and the affect they have on society as much as comparing them with the 1870s. How does that even approach a reasonable comparison on which to base a position?
Even as someone who takes
Even as someone who takes digital privacy very seriously, I think that CDT might be wasting their time on this one. Spokeo makes it clear, and not just in interviews (i.e. their Terms of Use, FAQs, Payment pages etc.) that not all of their information is accurate. If they said anything to the contrary ("100% Accurate! Click Here!") it would be different. It would be flagrant false advertising. The website goes about as far out of its way as it can without killing their profits. No one is being forced to pay for Spokeo. I've looked at the Terms of Use. It makes it clear that they don't guarantee data accuracy or information. Employers and users who read a lot into the 'Lifestyles' or 'Wealth' info (probably from notoriously inaccurate marketing lists, publicly-available ) do so at their own peril. A simple Google search will reveal almost all this information. Spokeo puts it all in one place, warts and all.
hmmm...
Curiously the same comment was posted here:
http://forums.pcworld.com/index.php?/topic/89699-cdt-files-privacy-credit-complaint-against-spokeocom/
to mis-quote Star Wars
Spokeo. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.
Spokeo ripe for a suit
The government can save their time. It will take just a few legitimate businesses to utilize their services and several individuals who can prove harm by utilization of such services. Spokeo will then become consumed by its legal radioactivity.
I don't know about this...
I’ve been doing searches on Spokeo long before this complaint was released, and I can’t seem to wrap my brain around whatever the problem is. I looked at the official complaint, and as a user I noticed some errors. You get so much more information and features after paying than you do for free, let me tell you. For me, Spokeo made it perfectly clear that the information provided should only be used as a reference, and that they don’t guarantee results. They’re an aggregator and a search engine, and I don’t know why people can’t figure that out.
Instead of attacking spokeo
Instead of attacking spokeo, which almost no one has ever heard of, the CDT needs to direct their attention to ChoicePoint! This company is used by almost all companies to perform cursory background checks on prospective employees. They aggregate information like insurance, income, legal judgements, personal information, and most of it is wrong! And they offer no way for you to correct the information!
cheapest oakley sunglasses
This essay writing too good, support!!! I like it very much!Oakley sunglasses are world renowned and considered the best in the market and this reputation is due in part to cheapest Oakley Sunglasses price and superior clarity and impact resistance; we are special to wholesale Oakley sunglasses,Welcome you to contact us about Oakley sunglasses wholesale.
Welcome to our website, you can buy the cheapest oakley sunglasses from us,We offer the oakley sunglasses for sale online. ( http://www.oakleysunglassesforsale.com).
Trends Spring Summer 2010 Sunglasses
As with everything else even sunglasses are taking a classic turn, the classic turn here being the colors that are going to be popular this season. The
colors are trending more towards neutrals.Dark Brown and Black Frames are extremely popular this season with lenses in grays and browns. This makes it easier
to work with them as these types of sunglasses go with a variety of our wardrobe colors.For those of us amongst us who are more fashion forward and like
colors, Spring Summer 2010 gives them options in the form of bright turquoise, pink and blue.Besides these color options, another hugely popular trend is in
the form of graduated tints and the more fashion conscious among us can make sure that the tints in the glasses match the color of the frame. mail me if you
are interest my collection..
Internet reference:http://picasaweb.google.ca/weizheng.sunglassesmail
mail/msn: candy-seasky@hotmail.com
Yahoo/ mail: candy13799678905@yahoo.com
skype:candy-seasky
Editor: alen
Post new comment