I recently went to a big box store and lifted the new Macbook Air in one hand and a Droid 2 in the other. The differences are narrowing. OK, I admit I would look silly holding the MBA up to my ear to make a call.
Smartphones are, by their nature, communication devices with limited computing functionality grafted on. Laptops/notebooks/netbooks, on the other hand, can be turned into full-featured smartphones, giving you the best of both worlds. While smartphones have their place and may in fact be adequate for some roaming knowledge workers, their ergonomic and, to a lesser extent, communications limitations are too great for them to ever be adequate replacements for notebooks.
For one, consider the onerous deployment and fleet logistics. There are three basic operating system choices for notebooks, Windows, MacOS or a Linux variant. We already know the devil-of-the-details regarding how to keep these payloads provisioned, largely malware free and up to date. The patch and fix drill, how to remotely kill them, and how to ensure they adhere to usage policies have been largely perfected through a variety of management apps.
Smartphones, by contrast, run one of six possible operating systems -- Apple iOS, Symbian, Windows Mobile, Android, Blackberry OS and HP/Palm webOS -- all of which have variants. While there are heterogeneous smartphone fleet management, administrative and provisioning applications coming onto the scene and some are becoming mature, they are comparatively primitive compared to the network and total-systems-management apps available today for laptops.
What's more, while smartphones can easily access Web apps, the availability of mobile Web apps that work with each of the six operating systems (or even a common browser like Opera) are more difficult to find.
But when it comes to use of these devices, obviously the biggest advantage of notebooks is screen and keyboard real estate. Requiring mobile workers to use their thumbs to write pages of information or fill in forms may actually be torture covered by the Warsaw Pact. Any type of work that requires more than a little key-based input is simply overwhelming on smartphones. And consider the misfortune of using, say, a spreadsheet when a phone call comes in. It's true that notebooks don't wake up and answer phone calls, but smartphones don't multitask (although we'll see that ability sooner rather than later as demand for parallel functionality continues — and it will drive your thumbs crazy).
Other key comparisons:
* Battery life. Obviously notebook (or even netbook) battery life can't measure up to what smartphones deliver. The latter can often work for days without a charge cycle, while some notebooks suck power from their batteries with a big straw. That said, modern notebooks often boast five plus hours of juice, which is adequate for most situations. And you can always get a second battery.
* Net options. Smartphones are always connected, or at least they are supposed to be. The reality is that data coverage is spotty and downloads in a bad cell can take forever. 4G doesn't really deliver the 100Mbps that the 4G ISO standards describe, either. If roaming network support is critical you can outfit your notebook with a data card and achieve all the WAN data support you can get with your phone. When it comes to connectivity in coffee shops, airports and what-not, most smartphones now support Wi-Fi, but mostly using 802.11b/g, not at 802.11n speeds, so notebooks have the hotspot advantage.
* Jacks. The jacks on a smartphone are limited and a function of the phone itself. On a good day you might get data transfer across a USB cable or via Bluetooth wireless. The rest is sneakernet using SD flash cards (where available on a smartphone), and it isn't pretty. That makes backing up smartphone user data and applications a bit more difficult, but not impossible. By contrast, even the cheapest netbooks have USB connection and gigabit Ethernet.
* Protecting data. Schemes for protecting organizational data on smartphones are sketchy at best, whereas the data protection schemes for Windows, MacOS and (depending on the hacking skills of the operator) Linux are pretty well-known.
It's my belief that mobile workers are probably chained to organizational and Web resources by a combination of notebook and mobile phone technologies. I'll agree that smartphones are way cool as personal tools. GPS devices, even notebook tethering is of great utility. Using smartphones to make and receive calls is great. But the ergonomic differences are real: we're more efficient with bigger screens, real keyboards, and greater data communications options. And we know how to deal with securing and policing notebooks.
I recently went to a big box store and lifted the new Macbook Air in one hand and a Droid 2 in the other. The differences are narrowing. OK, I admit I would look silly holding the MBA up to my ear to make a call.
Henderson is principal researcher at ExtremeLabs. He can be reached at kitchen-sink@extremelabs.com.


