<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/feed</link>
 <description>Network World blog posts and discussions</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>George</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57382</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57382#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57382 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Eric</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57381</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57381#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57381 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Maria</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57377</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57377#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57377 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft warns of SSL/TLS vulnerabilities</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57375</link>
 <description>First of all, this isn&#039;t just another Microsoft security flaw. Microsoft has filed this with ICASI as a general security vulnerability affecting multiple implementations of TLS and SSL. Moreover, Microsoft has noted it affects every currently supported version of Microsoft operating systems from Windows 2000 to Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2.  Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57375#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2220">OCS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1831">Office Communications Server</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alex Lewis</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57375 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Victor</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57383</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57383#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57383 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google Voice to storm the enterprise in 2010</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57374</link>
 <description>Google is planning on releasing an enterprise version of Google Voice in 2010, said    Google Enterprise President Dave Girouard in an interview earlier this week in eWeek. Voice will be bundled with Google Apps. Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57374#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22748">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25672">enterprise VoIP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2614">Google Apps</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/20571">Google Voice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/19635">LotusLive</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Google Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57374 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>interesting move - will it work?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57372</link>
 <description>Data center has been where Riverbed is weakest according to Gartner, Forrester etc.  Nice to see they are trying to fill a gap, even though it looks like they are still trailing some of the other Wanop players.  

Nice EMC reference above, but I am curious how much traction they are really getting with the storage players.  Those guys are a bit afraid of promoting an over distributed netowrking prodct like RVBD...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57372#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57372 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Oracle&#039;s &quot;roadmap&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57367</link>
 <description>Sun IDM has one of the largest install bases of IDM in the world.  The fact that Oracle assumes that current customers are going to simply roll over and convert to OIM makes my blood boil.  I hope all current Sun IDM customers realize that while Oracle may be able to come up with a migration &#039;tool&#039;, it will be for the DB and OOTB code.  All workflows and forms will need to be re-worked.  Sun IDM is too customized for a cookie cutter migration tool.  Oracle had so many options, like turning Sun IDM over to the public like Solaris and OpenSSO. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57367&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57367#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tdubois65</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57367 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Raymond</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57365</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57365#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57365 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>John</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57362</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57362#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57362 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bitlocker can also use a 256-bit key length</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57380</link>
 <description>&quot;BitLocker uses Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) as its encryption algorithm with configurable key lengths of 128 or 256 bits, as well as an optional Diffuser. The default encryption setting is AES-128 with Diffuser, but the options are configurable by using Group Policy.&quot;

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee449438(WS.10).aspx#BKMK_Form</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57380#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57380 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Charles</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57379</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57379#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57379 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sprint Streamlines Access to Business Applications Podcast</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57357</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;This podcast describes how Sprint makes applications accessible across all network technologies. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>zsnww</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57357 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Unified Communications Case Study</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57354</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unified Communications helped Sprint save millions of dollars. Find out how. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>zsnww</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57354 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Installing PerformancePoint 2010 Dashboard Designer</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57376</link>
 <description>PerformancePoint Dashboard Designer is the design tool you will use to build key performance indicators (KPIs), indicators, scorecards, reports, filters, data sources, and dashboards. It also enables you to deploy your finished dashboards to SharePoint.Dashboard Designer is a .NET Framework ClickOnce application that requires the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1. It also has a few other optional components that...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57376#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5052">PerformancePoint</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25674">PerformancePoint 2010</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25651">PPS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21277">SharePoint 2010</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/25673">SPS 2010</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ola Ekdahl</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57376 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft to shut off free versions of Windows 7 soon</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57353</link>
 <description>On March 1, users of the free, release candidate versions of Windows 7 will experience bi-hourly shut downs, Microsoft says. These shut downs will continue until June 1. On June 1, the RC version has officially expired. Microsoft will replace the wallpaper with a background that says the copy of Windows is not  genuine. After June 1,those who haven&#039;t upgraded to a purchased copy of Windows 7, which...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57353#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7678">Windows 7</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/808">Windows Genuine Advantage</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57353 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jake</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57349</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57349#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57349 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Brandon</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57373</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57373#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57373 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;focus on people and process&quot; - correct but also would need focus on software design! Rugged coding is very difficult, sometimes</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57348</link>
 <description>&quot;focus on people and process&quot; - correct but also would need focus on software design! Rugged coding is very difficult, sometimes almost impossible, when the design works against it!

Anyway, a great idea, good luck - just hope it gets going against &quot;agile&quot; and other fast profit ideas! Unfortunately after 40 years &quot;rugged&quot; software design I have seen the skills almost disappear on coder level (sorry, did mean on developer? level). &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57348&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57348#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tuomoks</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57348 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mike</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57371</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/57371#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">57371 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
