<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/feed</link>
 <description>Network World blog posts and discussions</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>EDDIE</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47433</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47433#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47433 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>John</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47432</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47432#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47432 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>F5 announces new management pack for OpsMgr 2007</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47431</link>
 <description>Prior to TechEd Europe this coming week, a number of third party vendors have made announcements. One of these is F5, who on November 3 announced its new F5 Management Pack Solution for OpsMgr 2007, allowing customers using F5 and Microsoft to dynamically manage application delivery in virtual environments, particularly when using Hyper-V and System Center Virtual Machine Manager.F5 has added Performance...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47431#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2196">F5 FirePass</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7239">Hyper-V</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/6360">OpsMgr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24755">PRO</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24756">PRO tips</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11359">Virtual Machine Manager</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11358">VMM</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kerrie Meyler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47431 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yes, I know I haven&#039;t been posting</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47430</link>
 <description>I haven&#039;t disappeared, I&#039;ve had several family medical related &quot;incidents&quot; to deal with. These are not over, but I will resume blogging as time permits. I appreciate your patience!</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47430#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kerrie Meyler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47430 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft Research?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47429</link>
 <description>Why do you say he&#039;s a former Microsoft Research employee? He doesn&#039;t say that, the bio on his book just says he&#039;s ex-Microsoft. Maybe you could ask him and clarify this.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47429#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47429 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Exchange Control Panel (ECP) in Exchange 2010</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47428</link>
 <description>New to Exchange 2010 is the Exchange Control Panel, or ECP.  This is a component of Outlook Web App 2010 where an administrator can sit in their OWA screen and not only check their emails, calendar appointments, and contacts, but can perform administrative tasks.  So instead of the administrator having to find a computer and terminal server remote into a system to add a user, delete a user, make...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47428#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24754">Exchange;Exchange 2010;Exchange Control Panel;ECP;Morimoto</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rand Morimoto</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47428 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>D.</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47427</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47427#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47427 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Font viewers/browsers</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47426</link>
 <description>I&#039;m unclear why this is a subject; Linux KDE v3.5.9 includes font facilities that are all in one place - install, remove, and view. I understand the Gnome folk and those who use LaTex have all the font tools they need too. 

Using more than four fonts in a text or context is likely to be unpleasant for readers. That ancient tech, the codex, provides good examples of what works for the long haul - does all that font stuff just signal someone with too much spare time?</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47426#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47426 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Taking Some Time Off From Blogging</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47425</link>
 <description>I&#039;m going to take some time off from blogging for at least a month, if not longer.  My MBA classes have been intense this semester and, honestly, I&#039;ve lost the motivation to blog each week.  It&#039;s not that big of a time commitment - about 2 hours a week.  But when it comes time to write the blog I either have homework to do or I&#039;ve done homework all day and would prefer watching a movie.
 Read more</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47425#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24753">Time Off</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>michaeljmorris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47425 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Recalls</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47424</link>
 <description>&quot;Retailers currently receive a number of notices from a number of different sources,” said Tim White

Further down:

“These things will happen because manufacturers and retailers are sourcing products from around the world,” she said. “So in case something does happen, we need to have a system that works, a system that’s fast, a system that allows retailers and suppliers to take product off the shelf.” 

Absolutely Correct. I could not agree more.

But barcodes are ABSOLUTELY not the answer! The recent Peanut Butter recall was a prime example. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47424&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47424#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47424 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco UC customers appear S.O.L. when in comes to deploying Windows 7</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47423</link>
 <description>At least Cisco is warning Unified Communications customers about it NOT successfully offering support for Microsoft Windows 7:

&quot;Cisco will have no liability for any delay in delivery, or failure to deliver, any or all of the planned Windows 7 support features set forth herein. Therefore, any such delay or failure will not in any way grant to Cisco customers the right to return, refund, adjust, or...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47423#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24752">Cisco is warning Unified Communications customers about NOT successfully offering support for Microsoft Windows 7</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24750">Cisco Unified Communications Support for Microsoft Windows 7</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24748">Cisco will have no liability for any delay in delivery</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7678">Windows 7</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24751">Windows 7 just not worth an all-out urgent effort by Cisco to support</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Brad Reese</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47423 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Baydaa</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47422</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47422#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47422 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Baydaa</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47421</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47421#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47421 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wow</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47420</link>
 <description>Wow thiss fuckinqqqqqqq KRAZYYYYYYY ! &amp;&amp; yall heariinnnq thus from freakinqq 7th qraderr . TMOBILE FUCKINQ SUCKSX</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47420#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47420 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lynn</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47418</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47418#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47418 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Gary</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47419</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47419#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47419 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>So if FTC&#039;s case is more about the future, does this mean that Intel is err, suspected of some nasty dealings in its feeble atte</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47417</link>
 <description>So if FTC&#039;s case is more about the future, does this mean that Intel is err, suspected of some nasty dealings in its feeble attempts to steal some of ARM&#039;s market?  One has to wonder whatever got into Nokia to use Atom for a MID.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47417#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Scunnerous</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47417 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>to got friend</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47416</link>
 <description>hi friend i like to friend you</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47416#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17">Software</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47416 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Using a switch with 2 subnets</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/itaa/using-switch-2-subnets</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is it possible to use a switch with 2 subnets?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The application is VoIP and data to run on 2 different subnets which have separate dedicated Broadband lines.  The two Broadband routers will be connected to the same switch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it possible to route the VoIP traffic to the Broadband router and data traffic to the data router using a switch?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The switch I intend to use is the Netgear FS728TP as it has PoE on all 24 ports and VoIP prioritisation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/itaa/using-switch-2-subnets#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/21">Network Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24746">2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/24747">subnets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1081">switches</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 09:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47415 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>kefah</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47414</link>
 <description></description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/47414#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47414 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
