<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Check Point</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1010</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>8-ball</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32719</link>
 <description>So does this mean it&#039;s already available? For a company their size, aren&#039;t they behind the 8-ball a little? i.e. Reflex, Stonesoft, Bluelane</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32719#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1010">Check Point</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/452">VPNs</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:49:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32719 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft addresses ZoneAlarm patch snafu</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29807</link>
 <description>Microsoft is re-issuing one of its advisories from this week&#039;s Patch Tuesday after some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9108298&amp;source=rss_topic17&quot;&gt;ZoneAlarm users complained&lt;/a&gt; they had dead Internet connections after installing the fix. Tuesday&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms08-037.mspx&quot;&gt;MS08-37 update&lt;/a&gt;, which fixed a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/070808-dns-flaw-disrupts-internet.html&quot;&gt;major DNS bug&lt;/a&gt;, now has an updated FAQ section that points ZoneAlarm and CheckPoint Endpoint Security customers to their respective Web sites for updates on how to fix the lossed Internet connection. Microsoft itself is not updating the actual patch.
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29807&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29807#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1010">Check Point</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2760">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/13585">ZoneAlarm</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:08:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>SecurityBlog</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29807 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: IBM System x3650</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22960</link>
 <description>This result is of no surprise, Checkpoint cheated - The IBM system runs a technology called coreXL which Checkpoint have developed to make use of multi-core CPUs.  The issue is that Checkpoint to date have only just allowed their other partners to develope this feature, Nokia and Crossbeam will release coreXL features in &#039;08.  As I say a good result but no surprise..</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22960#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1010">Check Point</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/227">firewalls</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/231">IBM</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 06:40:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22960 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Check Point VPN-1 UTM Gateway</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22614</link>
 <description>Big freaking deal! Checkpoint introduces another over-priced and over-complicated piece of technology and we&#039;re supposed to be excited? There are at least a dozen other solution providers offering a comparable product and a much better price point. And more importantly, every other vendor offer better support than Checkpoint. They&#039;re holier-than-thou haughty attitude may have gotten them to their past prominence, but now it only hastens their fall from grace.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22614#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1010">Check Point</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/227">firewalls</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/802">UTM</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:54:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>meatpieandtatters</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22614 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Check Point?s own UTM-1 2050</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21878</link>
 <description>I need information on how to configure BGP on the checkpoint UTM 2050.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21878#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1010">Check Point</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/227">firewalls</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2374">howto</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:15:32 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21878 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Value to new Check Point certification?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/15866</link>
 <description> &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/15866&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/15866#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/154">Careers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/72">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1010">Check Point</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:25:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">15866 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Check Point box plays &quot;Family Guy,&quot; too</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12977</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We&#039;re going to let my &lt;em&gt;Network World&lt;/em&gt; colleague Tim Greene take over Buzzblog for a moment to fill us in on a geeky YouTube clip that&#039;s starting to cause a stir:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Check Point Software&#039;s recently introduced UTM-1 security appliance is more than a way to protect networks from Internet threats - it can also be a home media center.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As this YouTube video - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUleb72-8Os&quot;&gt;&quot;Checkpoint UTM-1 to Media center in my living room&quot;&lt;/a&gt; - demonstrates, PC-based UTM-1 hardware can be modified to support the playing of videos - in this case an episode of &quot;Family Guy.&quot; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12977&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12977#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1010">Check Point</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/227">firewalls</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:47:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul McNamara</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">12977 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Adaptive Security Appliance key to Cisco turnaround success in firewall market</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12346</link>
 <description>By the end of 2005, Cisco was getting its butt kicked in the firewall market, even though the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/refurbished-cisco-pix-firewalls.htm&quot;&gt;Cisco PIX firewall&lt;/a&gt; had long been a familiar name.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/refurbished-cisco-pix-firewalls.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/images/pix-network-world.gif&quot; width=&quot;460&quot; height=&quot;82&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Cisco PIX Firewall&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npd.com/corpServlet?nextpage=commercial-technology-distributor-track_s.html&quot;&gt;The NPD Group/Distributor Track&lt;/a&gt;, which monitors the U.S. dollar volume sales of high-tech products through certain major distributors, Symantec held a 55.6 percent share of the firewall segment at the end of 2005, compared with Cisco&#039;s 17.8 percent.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=119159&quot;&gt;Dark Reading Risky Business&lt;/a&gt; reports that solution providers point to two key events as the impetus for what amounted to a dramatic turnaround in 2006. 

First, in June 2006 Symantec said it would decrease its investment in security appliances, including the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/products/category.jsp?pcid=1013&quot;&gt;Symantec Gateway Security appliance line&lt;/a&gt;, which includes firewall capabilities. 

Second, in July 2006 Cisco added &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crn.com/digital-home/190400035&quot;&gt;two new models&lt;/a&gt; to its Adaptive Security Appliance unified threat management series, which also includes a firewall. 

In the wake of these events, Cisco&#039;s U.S. dollar volume share for firewalls leapt nearly 20 percentage points in 2006 to 37.7 percent, overtaking Symantec&#039;s results, which slipped 21 percentages points to 34.6 percent, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npd.com/corpServlet?nextpage=commercial-technology-distributor-track_s.html&quot;&gt;NPD data&lt;/a&gt; shows. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.checkpoint.com/ngx/upgrade/whatsnew/products/vpn1.html&quot;&gt;Check Point Software Technologies&lt;/a&gt; is the third best-seller with a 15.2 percent share.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/pix-migration-to-asa.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/images/asa-network-world.gif&quot; width=&quot;460&quot; height=&quot;62&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Cisco ASA&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/cisco-smartnet.htm&quot;&gt;Cisco&#039;s SMARTnet&lt;/a&gt; support is another reason behind Cisco&#039;s recent firewall market gains because customers like having an entire organization that works with them to support complex solutions,&quot; said &lt;a href=&quot;http://tribecaexpress.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Gary Berzack&lt;/a&gt;, CTO of Cisco partner &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.etribeca.com/&quot;&gt;eTribeca&lt;/a&gt;, New York.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comnews.com/stories/articles/0704/0704guest.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/images/steve-pettit.gif&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; hspace=&quot;10&quot; width=&quot;133&quot; height=&quot;189&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Steve Pettit&quot;&gt;Steve Pettit&lt;/a&gt;, president of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bluesprucetechnologies.com/&quot;&gt;Blue Spruce Technologies&lt;/a&gt;, Greenland, N.H., is seeing &quot;a lot of customers&quot; upgrading from Cisco&#039;s PIX firewall to the ASA, and he thinks the ASA series is also taking market share away from Cisco competitors including Symantec and Check Point. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/pix-migration-to-asa.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Migration Guide from Cisco PIX 500 to
Cisco ASA 5500 Series&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;A big reason for Cisco&#039;s firewall market leadership is the trend toward companies looking to consolidate multiple functions within a single appliance, which has helped fuel sales of the ASA line,&quot; said Steven Reese, security practice manager at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nexusis.com/vpn.php&quot;&gt;Nexus Integration Services&lt;/a&gt;, a Valencia, Calif., solution provider.

&lt;table width=&quot;438&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;2&quot; cellpadding=&quot;2&quot; align=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr&gt;
				&lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#EAF0F7&quot; width=&quot;424&quot;&gt;
					&lt;div align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;
						&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot; color=&quot;#0c0c0c&quot; face=&quot;Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Firewalls&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;5&quot; color=&quot;#cc0000&quot; face=&quot;Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif&quot;&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Top 3 Best-Sellers*&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
						&lt;br /&gt;
						&lt;table width=&quot;424&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;2&quot;&gt;
							&lt;tr&gt;
								&lt;td align=&quot;left&quot; valign=&quot;top&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#EAF0F7&quot; width=&quot;158&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot; face=&quot;Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
								&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; valign=&quot;top&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#EAF0F7&quot; width=&quot;158&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot; face=&quot;Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2006&lt;br /&gt;
											MARKET SHARE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
								&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; valign=&quot;top&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#EAF0F7&quot; width=&quot;158&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot; face=&quot;Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MARKET-SHARE&lt;br /&gt;
											CHANGE OVER 2005&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
							&lt;/tr&gt;
							&lt;tr&gt;
								&lt;td align=&quot;left&quot; valign=&quot;top&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#FFFFCC&quot; width=&quot;158&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot; color=&quot;#cc0000&quot; face=&quot;arial, helvetica, verdana, Geneva, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cisco Systems&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
								&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; valign=&quot;top&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#FFFFCC&quot; width=&quot;158&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot; color=&quot;#cc0000&quot; face=&quot;arial, helvetica, verdana, Geneva, sans-serif&quot;&gt;37.7%&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
								&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; valign=&quot;top&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#FFFFCC&quot; width=&quot;158&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot; color=&quot;#cc0000&quot; face=&quot;arial, helvetica, verdana, Geneva, sans-serif&quot;&gt;+19.9&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
							&lt;/tr&gt;
							&lt;tr&gt;
								&lt;td align=&quot;left&quot; valign=&quot;top&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#EAF0F7&quot; width=&quot;158&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot; color=&quot;black&quot; face=&quot;arial, helvetica, verdana, Geneva, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Symantec&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
								&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; valign=&quot;top&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#EAF0F7&quot; width=&quot;158&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot; color=&quot;black&quot; face=&quot;arial, helvetica, verdana, Geneva, sans-serif&quot;&gt;34.6%&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
								&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; valign=&quot;top&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#EAF0F7&quot; width=&quot;158&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot; color=&quot;black&quot; face=&quot;arial, helvetica, verdana, Geneva, sans-serif&quot;&gt;-21&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
							&lt;/tr&gt;
							&lt;tr&gt;
								&lt;td align=&quot;left&quot; valign=&quot;top&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#EAF0F7&quot; width=&quot;158&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot; color=&quot;black&quot; face=&quot;arial, helvetica, verdana, Geneva, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Check Point&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
								&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; valign=&quot;top&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#EAF0F7&quot; width=&quot;158&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot; color=&quot;black&quot; face=&quot;arial, helvetica, verdana, Geneva, sans-serif&quot;&gt;15.2%&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
								&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; valign=&quot;top&quot; bgcolor=&quot;#EAF0F7&quot; width=&quot;158&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot; color=&quot;black&quot; face=&quot;arial, helvetica, verdana, Geneva, sans-serif&quot;&gt;+5.7&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
							&lt;/tr&gt;
						&lt;/table&gt;
					&lt;/div&gt;
					&lt;br /&gt;
					&lt;font size=&quot;1&quot; face=&quot;arial, Verdana, Helvetica, Geneva, sans-serif&quot;&gt;* RANKING BASED ON 2006 REVENUE SHARE; HIGHLIGHTED VENDOR GAINED GREATEST SHARE FROM 2005 TO 2006&lt;br /&gt;
						SOURCE: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npd.com/corpServlet?nextpage=commercial-technology-distributor-track_s.html&quot;&gt;THE NPD GROUP/DISTRIBUTOR TRACK&lt;/a&gt; (INCLUDES GTDC DATA)&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;1&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
					&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
				&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br&gt;

You may find of interest the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/juniper-firewall-vs-cisco.pdf&quot;&gt;Miercom Lab Test&lt;/a&gt; comparing the Cisco ASA 5520 Adaptive Security Appliance against the following Unified Threat Management (UTM) security appliance competitors: Check Point VPN-1 Pro, Fortinet FortiGate 1000 and Juniper Networks NetScreen-208.

Do &lt;b&gt;you&lt;/b&gt; have an interesting story about how the Cisco ASA has had a dramatic impact on Cisco&#039;s fortunes in the firewall market?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/brad-reese.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.bradreese.com/images/brad-signature.gif&quot; width=&quot;111&quot; height=&quot;47&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Brad Reese Profile&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.BradReese.Com/&quot;&gt;http://www.BradReese.Com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12346&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/12346#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1914">Adaptive Security Appliance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1918">ASA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1010">Check Point</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1562">cisco systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/715">firewall</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/227">firewalls</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1367">Fortinet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1593">Juniper Networks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1253">management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1920">NetScreen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1917">security infrastructure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1606">SMARTnet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/798">Symantec</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1916">unified threat management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/802">UTM</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 04:57:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Brad Reese</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">12346 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It only took Check Point how many years?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/11201</link>
 <description> &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/11201&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/11201#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1010">Check Point</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/227">firewalls</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 08:51:50 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">11201 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Check Point will reveal new road map</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/10489</link>
 <description> &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/10489&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/10489#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1010">Check Point</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/227">firewalls</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:23:35 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gils</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">10489 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Check Point to acquire NFR Security</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/9890</link>
 <description> &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/9890&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/9890#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1010">Check Point</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/227">firewalls</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1105">intrusion detection</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:45:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">9890 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wake up call: An Open Letter to Gil Shwed, CEO of Check Point Software</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/9645</link>
 <description> &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/9645&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/9645#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1010">Check Point</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/227">firewalls</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:26:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">9645 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Check Point adds encryption with Pointsec buy</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/9353</link>
 <description> &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/9353&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/9353#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1010">Check Point</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 05:54:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">9353 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The open letter to Check Point</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/9021</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your reaction to Richard Stiennon&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2006/102606stiennon.html&quot;&gt;open letter to Check Point CEO Gil Shwed&lt;/a&gt; on how the company should improve itself.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/9021#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1010">Check Point</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:48:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Security</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">9021 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
