<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Ethernet</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Intel sues N-Data over Ethernet patent claims</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31177</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;An Ethernet patent dispute is again rearing its ugly head in court this week as Intel has filed suit against patent licensing firm  &lt;a href=&quot;http://negotiateddata.com/&quot;&gt;Negotiated Data Solutions&lt;/a&gt; (N-Data) looking to indemnify Intel customers against any royalty claims N-Data is looking to grab. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31177&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/31177#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/778">FTC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/579">Intel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8912">N-Data</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:26:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Layer 8</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31177 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How important will an external control plane be...</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29402</link>
 <description>How important will an external control plane be for carrier ethernet?

What does everyone think of Soapstone&#039;s prospects?</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/29402#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/206">carriers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:07:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">29402 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Future Ethernet - Fiber vs. Copper</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28787</link>
 <description>Ethernet started as the shared copper medium (cable) technology. As data speed increased from 10Mbps to 1Gbps, then Ethernet no more remained the shared medium and required point to point inter-connect. Ethernet switches are used to have LAN implemented when going to from shared cable to dedicated link. Fiber became one of the medium for Gige Ethernet and became medium for choice for longer distance (more than 300 meters) upto 80 Kilometers. Fiber was the first medium for be used for 10GE. Now copper is also supported for 10GE, but it is limited in distance (150m) and requires higher powers. Hardware chip companies are struggling to lower down the power of 10GE copper solution. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28787&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28787#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7277">copper</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5003">fiber</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:30:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>surender</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28787 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thin Wire Ethernet</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28210</link>
 <description>Sounds like the old &#039;thin wire&#039; ethernet of the 80&#039;s without the TV signals...</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/28210#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:02:32 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28210 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Big market for IP managed services </title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27986</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A study by market tracker Ovum and commissioned by Cisco finds that the market for four specific managed services will grow to $66 billion by 2012.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The four services are managed metro Ethernet, managed IP VPNs, managed IP voice and managed security. The report notes that the market for these services is currently growing at a compounded annual rate of 18%. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study was based on data collected from more than 1,300 individuals in companies using managed services in 14 countries across the Americas, Europe, Middle East, Africa and Asia. The companies are in the finance, manufacturing, retail, government, healthcare and education markets.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27986&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27986#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/812">IP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1272">managed services</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:59:23 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27986 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What is WAN (Metro) Ethernet?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27953</link>
 <description>Metro Ethernet is the use of telco carrier-supported Ethernet technology in metropolitan area networks (MANs) or Wide Area Networks (WANs) vs. using Ethernet technology for just a Local Area Network (LAN), the most widely used application for the Ethernet protocol.

Because it is typically a collective endeavor with numerous financial contributors, Metro Ethernet offers cost-effectiveness, reliability, scalability and bandwidth management superior to most proprietary networks. Metro Ethernet can connect businesses LANs and individual end users to a WAN or to the Internet. Corporations, academic institutions and government agencies in large cities can use Metro Ethernet to connect branch campuses or offices to an intranet. 
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27953&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27953#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/767">bandwidth</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/525">broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12192">fast e</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12191">gig e</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/504">ISP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11553">lan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1089">metro Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/739">MPLS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3659">PRI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/499">SIP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/9835">T1</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2182">telecommunications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12193">voice-data</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/220">VoIP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2273">WAN</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:43:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>BandwidthSeek.Net</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27953 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Enterasys, Extreme hooking up?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27838</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Could Enterasys be looking at possibly acquiring rival Extreme Networks? There&amp;#39;s been a flurry of speculation on that this&lt;img src=&quot;/graphics/community/extreme-logo.gif&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt; week. Enterasys has made no bones about its intention to acquire a sizable company that will take it close to $1 billion in annual revenue and better compete with Cisco and new enterprise LAN switch entrant Juniper Networks. Extreme and Enterasys both do about $350 million in yearly sales. &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27838&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27838#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3199">acquisitions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/12058">LAN switching</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:42:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27838 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Configuring an L2TPv3 Ethernet Pseudowire</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26272</link>
 <description>  &lt;p&gt;As I mentioned last time, L2TPv3 has a plethora of capabilities, including the capability to be used for remote access VPNs, the capability to transport a number of Layer-2 protocols in a pseudowire configuration, the capability to transport MPLS Layer-3 VPN traffic, and the capability to transport IPv6 over an IPv4 backbone network.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this blog post, I am going to focus on the most popular application for L2TPv3 - pseudowires.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The first question to answer in regard to L2TPv3 pseudowire configuration is, ‘What is a pseudowire?&amp;#39;. As I mentioned briefly last time, a pseudowire is simply an emulated circuit. By using L2TPv3, it is possible to extend a number of layer-2 circuit types over an IP backbone network. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26272&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26272#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8216">l2tp</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10601">l2tpv3</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/10602">pseudowire</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/813">VPN</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/452">VPNs</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:18:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark_Lewis</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26272 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Ethernet patent settlement is good for the industry</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24303</link>
 <description>Interesting story, but am I alone in wanting to know what the actual settlement was?  Frankly, that&#039;s why I looked at the story, but there is no mention if N-Data will be charging $1000 one time fee or no fee !!</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24303#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8912">N-Data</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:32:57 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24303 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FTC throws cold water on Ethernet patent overcharges</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24290</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Verdana&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt;The US Federal Trade Commission today settled a complaint against a company the agency said was trying to collect huge license despite a prior, paid up agreement.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Verdana&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot;&gt; &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24290&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/24290#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/29">Data Center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1035">General discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/26">VoIP / Convergence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/778">FTC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8912">N-Data</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8913">National Semiconductor</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8911">NWay</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2207">Robert Metcalfe</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:45:31 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Layer 8</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24290 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>MacBook Air: .11n Standard, Ethernet Optional</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23978</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So Apple announced their thin notebook, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/macbookair/&quot;&gt;MacBook Air&lt;/a&gt; moments ago, and I couldn&amp;#39;t help but notice that, thin coolness aside, there is no Ethernet port on this machine. There&amp;#39;s an optional USB-attached Ethernet dongle (no full-speed Gig-E, then), but users are expected to be wireless essentially all of the time. This is more than a cynical attempt to sell APs (Apple also announced a couple of these, equipped with large hard drives for their clever real-time backup mechanism, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/timemachine.html&quot;&gt;Time Machine&lt;/a&gt;); it&amp;#39;s the future. Still, this is a gutsy move for Apple, but, then, they&amp;#39;ll sell tons of these no matter what. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23978&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23978#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/699">802.11n</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/82">Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8646">macbook air</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:07:27 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Craig Mathias</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23978 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Can carrier Ethernet answer the call for bigger bandwidth?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23770</link>
 <description>I curious to find out abt Yipes viability, and their ability to thrive in mkt place.
</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23770#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/206">carriers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3553">Yipes</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:41:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23770 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Ethernet vs. MPLS in the WAN</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21599</link>
 <description>IP MPLS and Ethernet VPLS services are both based on MPLS technology, and thus are able to meet the needs for a multipoint-to-multipoint converged network.  The only difference is that one is handed off as a layer 3 service (IP MPLS) and the other as a layer 2 service (Ethernet VPLS).  From our perspective, applications more than security or a desire to control routing seem to be driving the migration to Ethernet VPNs.  It&#039;s not so much control of routing being a driver as it is not having to deal with another carriers IP network addressing policies.  Ethernet end-to-end is simply easier to manage and scale than an IP MPLS network. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21599&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21599#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/739">MPLS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/7072">VPLS</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:01:03 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Keao Caindec</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21599 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: IEEE chooses two higher speeds for Ethernet</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20982</link>
 <description>Would companies interested in this technology shy away from using unless standards are in place?</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/20982#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5775">IEEE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/262">standards</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:48:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">20982 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Xerox&#039;s PARC wants to help you create the next Ethernet -- or whatever it is you want to build</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/19809</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;PARC, a Xerox company, is formalizing the process through which it works with young companies and entrepreneurs in an effort to help them be successful while also enriching itself. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.parc.com/about/startup/&quot;&gt;Startup@PARC&lt;/a&gt;  program gives entrepreneurs access to PARC&amp;#39;s scientific minds and intellectual property in exchange for cash, royalties, equity compensation or some combo of that. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PARC has already worked with numerous small companies to help get them going on to bigger things. &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2007/091807-powerset-natural-search.html&quot;&gt;Powerset&lt;/a&gt; , a new search engine company, is among its current partners.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/19809#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5307">entrepreneurs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5821">PARC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5823">Powerset</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5822">startups</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/557">Xerox</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:16:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alpha Doggs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19809 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: Does 802.11n spell the &#039;end of Ethernet&#039;?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/19352</link>
 <description>Absolutely not.  In deployments where RFI and security are concerns, wireless will not supercede wired Ethernet.  It&#039;s silly to suppose that saturated airwaves is the environment for dependable network connectivity, which is where we&#039;ll all be if everyone&#039;s wired connections became wireless.</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/19352#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/699">802.11n</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:31:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19352 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: 0Base-T</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18307</link>
 <description>At first I was going to discount reading this article but then took a second look and read through it.  So if &quot;0&quot; is power what will &quot;null&quot; (empty set), &quot;-10,-100,-N&quot;(set of negative numbers), and &quot;j&quot; (imaginary) stand for??</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/18307#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 03:10:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">18307 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Overly chatty operating systems</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17874</link>
 <description>If you are really going to do something about energy efficient ethernet, then start with some of the overly chatty OS&#039;s out there that spam unneeded traffic into and over ethernet lines.  That is the first place to start.

&lt;em&gt;Re: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/lans/2007/0723lan2.html&quot;&gt;Energy Efficient Ethernet moves forward&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17874#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:17:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">17874 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EFM</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/16829</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;EFM (Ethernet in the First Mile) is an effort to extend Ethernet&#039;s reach over the access line between end users and carriers, to make Ethernet a low-cost broadband alternative to such technologies as DSL and cable modems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In June 2004, the IEEE approved a formal specification developed by its &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ieee802.org/3/efm/index.html&quot;&gt;802.3ah Task Force&lt;/a&gt; and backed by the EFM Alliance, a vendor consortium.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The specification includes physical-layer specifications for copper, fiber point-to-point and fiber point-to-multipoint. In addition, the IEEE is looking to provide a common method for operation, administration and maintenance to help service providers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/16829#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2865">EFM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3887">WAN services</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:31:34 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Inbox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">16829 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CSMA/CD</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/16479</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;CSMA/CD (Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection) is the IEEE 802.3 Standard Ethernet contention protocol which specifies rules on how Ethernet devices respond when more than one device attempts to use the data channel simultaneously.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Submitted by George Macdonald.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Additional resources&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/&quot;&gt;IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/16479#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5498">C</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3729">CSMA/CD</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1062">Ethernet</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:42:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Inbox</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">16479 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
