<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>messaging protocols</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11158</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft sends an open source message by joining the AMQP working group</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/34421</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/Micronet%20images/peace-sign.jpg&quot; border=&quot;1&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;1&quot; vspace=&quot;1&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;UPDATE: 10/27 (from Microsoft Subnet editor &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/microsoftsubnet&quot;&gt;Julie Bort&lt;/a&gt;): Microsoft has today answered my e-mail asking how MSMQ might be affected by AMQP.  According to Greg Thomas, Sr. Manager, Platform Strategy for Microsoft, &amp;quot;Today our customers have diverse and complex messaging needs that no single IT company alone can address. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/34421&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/34421#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/123">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17159">Advanced Message Queuing Protocol Working Group</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17160">AMQP</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11158">messaging protocols</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17158">Microsoft messaging</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/5135">Microsoft versus open source</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17161">MSMQ</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/260">open source</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17163">WCF</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/17162">Windows Communication Foundation</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:43:36 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Microsoft Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">34421 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Messaging: Cellular or Internet Protocols?</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26912</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The subject of instant messaging came up this week (and the week is just getting started) via a call from an editor who wanted to talk quite broadly about this topic, particularly with respect to how IM is being used in business. In general, I am not personally a fan of IM, and rarely recommend it beyond purely personal use, for two reasons: it&amp;#39;s not secure, and, even more importantly, it&amp;#39;s not auditable. This is why many enterprises ban the use of IM at work - there&amp;#39;s no trail of what was communicated as there is with e-mail. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26912&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26912#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/45">Wireless / Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/481">IM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/244">Instant Messaging</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11158">messaging protocols</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1942">MMS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/252">SMS</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:19:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Craig Mathias</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26912 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
