<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Shimel</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11709</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Don&#039;t even bother investing in Network Admission Control </title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27459</link>
 <description>  &lt;p&gt;Alright I will take the bait.  I am a sucker for a good troll.  :-)  Alan Shimel, chief blogger for NAC provider StillSecure, came away from RSA&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stillsecureafteralltheseyears.com/ashimmy/2008/05/is-nac-clawing.html&quot; title=&quot;Alan&#039;s high hopes for NAC&quot;&gt; pretty upbeat&lt;/a&gt;  about the prospects for NAC.  His likening me to the Grinch refers to my frequent &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=28&quot; title=&quot;Knocking CNAC&quot;&gt;cries of protest&lt;/a&gt;  that NAC is worthless.  I guess he is afraid that I will ruin the Christmas morning pay off that the NAC vendors hope for.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27459&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27459#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11707">grinch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/760">NAC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/11709">Shimel</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:20:22 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>stiennon</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27459 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
