<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.networkworld.com/community" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>PCI</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1289</link>
 <description>Showing new posts in a forum view</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Cisco targets healthcare data security</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30525</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Cisco has followed its Payment Card Industry data security service for the retail industry with security for the healthcare sector. Called PCI for Healthcare Solution, it offers design and implementation &lt;img style=&quot;width: 100px; height: 83px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/doctor.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;100&quot; height=&quot;83&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;guidelines to protect credit card, patient demographic and employee information. Cisco has also joined the PCI Security Standards Council, which helps define future data security policy. Cisco says its Unified Wireless Networks and Ironport e-mail security appliances have received endorsement from the American Hospital Association.  &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30525&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30525#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/627">healthcare</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1289">PCI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/14255">PCI for Healthcare Solution</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:12:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30525 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>This is all Visa&#039;s fault!</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27389</link>
 <description>Visa&#039;s product is inherently insecure.  Rather than fix the product to make it secure, they are strong-arming the merchants into spending an inordinate amount of time and money to shore up their product.  Even if you are deemed compliant, there is no safe-harbor and no recourse from them taking money straight out of your merchant account.  </description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27389#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/3496">data breaches</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1289">PCI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/66">privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1480">visa</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:06:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27389 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cisco promotes Lean Architecture to retailers</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23929</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Fresh from its splash at the Consumer Electronics Show last week, Cisco is targeting consumers in another way - through &lt;img style=&quot;width: 88px; height: 58px&quot; src=&quot;/graphics/community/retail-show.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;88&quot; height=&quot;58&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; /&gt;partnerships with retailers. At this week&amp;#39;s National Retail Federation Conference in New York, Cisco released several initiatives, including its Lean Retail Architecture, the expansion of its Cisco Payment Card Industry Validated Network Design, and unified communications platforms specifically for retailers. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23929&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23929#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/605">data center</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/8623">National Retail Federation Conference</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1289">PCI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1288">retailers</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:54:48 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23929 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>PCI Compliance, the 12 Step Program</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22442</link>
 <description>If your company stores, processes, or transmits the primary account number on a credit card then you are required to meet, or exceed, the data security standards set forth in the PCI security standards.  These security requirements apply to all network components that forward or have access to card holder data.  This would include switches, routers, firewalls, IPS, Servers, workstations, wireless, storage, etc.  So basically,  if the device is IP (Internet Protocol) reachable to cardholder data then it is in scope for the PCI requirements.  
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22442&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22442#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2746">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/747">compliance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4620">Heary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/4641">Jamey Heary</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1289">PCI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:07:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jheary</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22442 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wireless Warnings</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22001</link>
 <description>         &lt;p style=&quot;margin-bottom: 0in&quot;&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;font-size: 11pt&quot;&gt;If you do retail, and take credit cards (which you pretty much have to), your wireless network is about to cause you severe grief. The PCI (Payment Card Industry) regulations kicking into gear demand you monitor and protect your network, including the wireless parts. And a story called &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2007/111607-what-retail-wireless.html&quot;&gt;What Retail Wireless Security?&lt;/a&gt; says too few are doing so now.&lt;/font&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22001&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22001#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1289">PCI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/2554">TJX</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/52">wireless</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:07:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Gaskin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">22001 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Credit Card Crackdown</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21721</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If you take credit cards in your business, even a handful a year, the Payment Card Industry (PCI) became your business partner with their new &lt;a href=&quot;/news/tech/2007/110107-tech-update.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;regulations&lt;/a&gt;. Worse, states are starting to make new laws guaranteed to hammer small businesses as an example to look like they&amp;#39;re doing something, rather than really addressing the credit card data loss problem. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21721&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21721#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/30">SMB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1289">PCI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/58">security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 07:36:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Gaskin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21721 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RE: PCI compliance mandate&#039;s power raises conflict-of-interest questions</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21715</link>
 <description>The potential for conflict of interest with the same person selling security equipment who is conducting the audit is poor. The only way around this is independent certification of security products to determine whether they are compliant as per PCI standards. The ONLY company which is doing this right now to my knowledge is NSS Labs (out of Chicago). NSS has a long history of security testing and certification and, more importantly, appears to be the ONLY independent security testing and certification facility which is truly independent (i.e. is not owned by or affiliated with a company with a vested interest in selling security products or managed services). &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21715&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Read more&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/21715#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/16">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1289">PCI</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 04:09:17 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21715 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Buying standards-compliant gear may not immediately make you compliant</title>
 <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/10759</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://infosecplace.com/blog/2007/01/23/cisco-and-cybertrust-team-up-on-pcidss/&quot;&gt;Bloggers are debating&lt;/a&gt; whether Cisco&amp;#39;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2007/prod_011607c.html&quot;&gt;announcement&lt;/a&gt; that it has teamed  with Cybertrust to build PCI Data Security Standard systems for retailers is clear in that the systems are aimed at &lt;em&gt;helping retailers achieve&lt;/em&gt; PCI compliance, not that you can buy their product and immediately be compliant. An auditor of the retail standard is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;962716575&quot;&gt;alerting retailers&lt;/a&gt;  to make sure they realize the difference. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Has Cisco made the distinction clear enough for prospective buyers?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/10759#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/47">Cisco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/22">LANs / WANs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1289">PCI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/1288">retailers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.networkworld.com/community/taxonomy/term/262">standards</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:08:43 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cisco Subnet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">10759 at http://www.networkworld.com/community</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
